|
Post by jcurio on Oct 26, 2017 0:09:17 GMT -6
People often look to Elvis Presley as the first true American "superstar," but I counter that with the example of John F. Kennedy. A number of factors conspired to make Kennedy and his young wife darlings of the media: he was young, handsome, rich, and an aristocratic liberal from the Northeast much like FDR was (his family was close with the Roosevelts). The media wields a tremendous amount of power to influence the thoughts and opinions of the public - Goebbels of Nazi Germany proved that when he cast Hitler as a hero of the German people during his rise to power. In psychology, this is often referred to as non-message factors: the attractiveness of the messenger typically carries much more weight than their actual message. How they say something is more important than what they say, and how they are perceived is more important than their actions and behaviors. This is demonstrated time and again in American public life: the Congress has never had a public approval rating higher than 15%, yet 90%+ of all congresspeople are re-elected to office every election cycle. How can this abnormally high incumbency ratio be explained, especially when the majority of Americans disapprove of the job that Congress does? Non-message factors and the persuasion of advertising and emotional manipulation. We see presidents with abysmally low approval ratings, some of whom were revealed to have lied to the American public and the world at large (ala George W. Bush), re-elected for a second term in the Oval Office. It might seem mysterious on a superficial level, but research over the years has identified the importance of non-message factors, especially when promulgated by the media, as being a deciding factor in influencing the American public. John F. Kennedy was no different. He was young, rich, handsome, and Catholic...these things made him different than the presidential norm in his day. The media love-affair with him and Jackie created what is known in political science circles as "Camelot:" the myth of John F. Kennedy as a savior of both America and the world. I'm still hoping that "one day", Bewilderd will return. 😊
|
|
whatwouldyousuggest
Junior Member
I once was...I am again..I always will be....all hail the personal opinion
Posts: 121
|
Post by whatwouldyousuggest on Oct 26, 2017 4:25:35 GMT -6
I enjoyed talking to him too. Miss him
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Oct 26, 2017 13:57:42 GMT -6
JFK ASSASSINATION FILES: JFK Assassination Files can be accessed at JFK Assassination Records - 2017 Additional Documents Release. www.archives.gov/research/jfk/2017-release You will need Microsoft XL software in order to access the files.
JFK Assassination Records - 2017 Additional Documents Release
The National Archives and Records Administration is releasing documents previously withheld in accordance with the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act. The vast majority of the Collection (88%) has been open in full and released to the public since the late 1990s. The records at issue are documents previously identified as assassination records, but withheld in full or withheld in part. Learn more
This July release consists of 3,810 documents, including 441 formerly withheld-in-full documents and 3,369 documents formerly released with portions redacted. The documents originate from FBI and CIA series identified by the Assassination Records Review Board as assassination records. More releases will follow.
To view the entire file, you may visit the National Archives at College Park and request access to the original records. Accessing the Release Files
Each release file is a ZIP file containing copies of the records and a corresponding XLSX spreadsheet with metadata about each file.
To access the files, you will need:
decompression software such as WinZip to “unzip” the contents software such as Adobe Acrobat to view the PDF files software such as Windows Media Player to listen to the WAV files software such as Microsoft Excel to view the XLSX spreadsheet
Once a file has been unzipped, use the XLSX spreadsheet to understand the content and context of each file. www.archives.gov/research/jfk/2017-release Twitter JFK FILES: twitter.com/hashtag/JFKFiles?src=hash HOW TO READ THE JFK ASSASSINATION FILE: www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/10/26/jfk-secret-assassination-files-how-to-read-them-215749
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Oct 26, 2017 16:24:32 GMT -6
www.aol.com/article/news/2017/10/26/release-of-jfk-assassination-files-is-delayed-as-deadline-looms/23257483/ Nick PopeVerified account @nickpopemod 1h1 hour ago
"I have no choice - today - but to accept those redactions ...". twitter.com/realDonaldTrump The spiky wording by @realdonaldtrump implies a dogfight over the #JFKFiles twitter.com/hashtag/JFKFiles?src=hash Release of JFK assassination files is delayed as deadline loomsNBC News by EN DILANIAN and CORKY SIEMASZKO Oct 26th 2017 The U.S. government was in danger Thursday of missing the deadline to release a trove of previously classified records from the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, adding an unexpected twist to a saga already rife with rumors and conspiracies. The National Archives needs the official approval of President Donald Trump to begin releasing the 35,000 documents online and meet a deadline to divulge the papers set by Congress 25 years ago by The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act. But as of Thursday afternoon, the memo specifying which material the CIA, State Department and other agencies still want to keep under wraps had not made it to Trump’s desk, U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News. “There’s a mad scramble going on in the executive branch to get this done,” one official told NBC News. The CIA is asking only for some redactions, not for all the documents to be held, the official said. But the other agencies involved in the process have not yet finished their submissions. So only a handful of documents were expected to be released on Thursday, not the entire batch, officials told NBC News. Trump, who is no stranger to peddling conspiracy theories about the Kennedy killing, had appeared to be especially eager to get the latest JFK documents out. This is likely to be the last JFK document dump, and it remains to be seen whether it finally satisfies people who still dispute the finding of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he gunned down Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963. The assassination shocked the nation and spawned a conspiracy industry that continues to pump out alternate theories about who was really behind the killing. Officials at the National Archives have made a point of trying to tamp down expectations that the newest batch of documents contain any blockbuster revelations — and have noted repeatedly that about 90 percent of the available records related to the assassination are already public. Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who used his body to shield the mortally wounded president and first lady Jacqueline Kennedy after the first shots rang out in Dallas, said earlier Thursday that he hoped the latest declassified papers shed light on why Oswald pulled the trigger. “I’m hoping that within that material — and there’s lots of it — there will be some indication as to the motive, the reason why he did what he did,” Hill told MSNBC. Hill said he still blames himself for not reacting faster when the presidential motorcade came under fire. “Deep down I still have that sense of guilt that I should have been able to get there quicker, and I didn’t,” he said. “I was the only one who had a chance to do anything.” The paperwork that was scheduled to be unveiled on Thursday had been vetted by the Assassination Records Review Board, a panel created in the aftermath of Oliver Stone’s 1991 conspiracy film “JFK,” which popularized the notion that Kennedy was killed by rogue FBI and CIA agents. The ARRB released the bulk of the JFK assassination paperwork two years after it was founded. The new documents were marked “NBR,” or Not Believed Relevant, the panel’s chairman, John Tunheim, said in March at a National Press Club conference in Washington. “It’s not that important to keep protecting it,” he said. Still, he added, “I think there will be stuff interesting to researchers.” Some 200 pages of the new batch are expected to delve into the six-day visit Oswald, a onetime Marine who had defected to the Soviet Union, made to Mexico City just before Kennedy's assassination. One of the juiciest stories is likely to be that of June Cobb, a CIA spy who was working in Cuba and Mexico who reported that Oswald had been spotted in Mexico City. Cobb, born Viola June Cobb in Ponca City, Oklahoma, died on Oct. 17, 2015, in New York City, where she was living in a Manhattan senior center, an official there and her former sister-in-law told NBC News. Tunheim said the CIA, State Department and other federal agencies balked at releasing the Mexico City paperwork “because it was thought to be detrimental to our relationship with the Mexican government at the time.” www.aol.com/article/news/2017/10/26/release-of-jfk-assassination-files-is-delayed-as-deadline-looms/23257483/
|
|
whatwouldyousuggest
Junior Member
I once was...I am again..I always will be....all hail the personal opinion
Posts: 121
|
Post by whatwouldyousuggest on Oct 26, 2017 23:13:14 GMT -6
There will be nothing...in those files to implicate our government.
|
|
whatwouldyousuggest
Junior Member
I once was...I am again..I always will be....all hail the personal opinion
Posts: 121
|
Post by whatwouldyousuggest on Oct 26, 2017 23:42:26 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Oct 30, 2017 13:17:35 GMT -6
www.history.com/news/why-the-public-stopped-believing-the-government-about-jfks-murder?cmpid=TWITTER_TWITTER__20171030&linkId=44118387 Why the Public Stopped Believing the Government about JFK’s MurderBy Steven Gillon / www.history.com/news/author/stevengillon October 30, 2017 A view through a gun sight from the Texas School Book Depository is part of a reenactment of the Kennedy assassination. This evidence was submitted to the Warren Commission. (Credit: Corbis via Getty Images)The media frenzy over the release of new documents related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy highlights the ongoing public fascination with JFK and his death. Do the documents add to our understanding of the assassination, the motives of the assassin, or the possibility of conspiracy? The new materials are part of a debate that began with the 1964 Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, popularly known as the Warren Commission. Established by President Lyndon Johnson one week after the assassination, it concluded, after nearly 10 months of investigation, that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, had fired three bullets from the sixth floor of the school depository building. It found that Oswald’s death 48 hours later at the hands local nightclub owner Jack Ruby was an act of spontaneous revenge. It’s hard to believe now, but the Warren Commission initially received a warm reception and the public seemed willing to accept its conclusions. Before the release of the report a Gallup poll found that only 29 percent of Americans thought Oswald acted alone, while 52 percent believed in some kind of conspiracy. A few months after the release of the report, 87 percent of respondents believed Oswald shot the President. Over the next few years however, critics turned public opinion against the report. In 1966, Mark Lane published his bestseller Rush to Judgment. Later that year, a New Orleans district attorney, Jim Garrison, launched a highly publicized, but deeply flawed, investigation of his own which purported to reveal a vast conspiracy. At the same time, Life Magazine published color reproductions of the Zapruder film, a graphic home movie of the shooting by a local dressmaker, under the cover: “Did Oswald Act Alone? A Matter of Reasonable Doubt.” The editors questioned the Commission’s conclusions and called for a new investigation. Most of these early skeptics used the Warren Commission’s own evidence against it. They focused on contradictions among some of the witnesses about the number of shots and from where they were fired. Some witnesses claim they heard gunfire from the grassy knoll, an elevated area to the front, right of the presidential limousine. A favorite topic was the so-called “magic bullet.” According to the Warren Commission, Oswald fired three shots in 8.6 seconds: the first shot missed, the second shot struck Kennedy in the back, exited through his throat, and then hit Texas Governor John Connally, breaking a rib, shattering his wrist, and ending up in his right thigh. Critics claimed the bullet, which remained largely intact, could not have been responsible for all the damage. And, if Connally and Kennedy were hit by different bullets in a matter of seconds, then it meant there had to be another shooter. These criticisms took their toll. By the early 1970s, many Americans were skeptical of the commission and its conclusions. The most serious threat to the Commission’s credibility, however, came not from the army of investigative reporters and self-styled assassination experts, but from a new government investigation. In December 1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations, after two years of work, concluded that although Oswald was the assassin, there was a conspiracy involving a second gunman. The committee relied on the highly questionable acoustical analysis of a dictabelt recording from Dallas police headquarters. It contained sounds from a police motorcycle in Dealey Plaza whose radio transmitting switch was stuck in the on position. Two acoustics experts said there was a 95 percent certainty that the recording revealed that four shots had been fired at the presidential motorcade. As a result, the House Committee came to the bizarre conclusion that there was a second shooter on the grassy knoll, and that shooter fired at the President, but missed. Coming in the wake of Vietnam and Watergate, the House Select Committee’s report added to public cynicism about the Warren Commission conclusions. At just the time that Americans were learning that the government lied to them about Vietnam and Watergate, they now discovered it had lied about aspects of the assassination of President Kennedy. If the CIA and the FBI had lied to the Commission, the reasoning went, then they clearly had something to hide. There were now two conspiracies: The conspiracy to assassinate the President and, potentially, an even larger and more insidious conspiracy among powerful figures in government and the media to cover it up. Before the 1970s most conspiracy theories focused on the Russians or possibly the Cubans. By the 1980s, polls showed that large majorities of Americans now believed their own government was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy. A Newsweek poll taken on the 20th anniversary of the assassination showed that 74 percent of Americans believed that “others were involved,” while only 11 percent thought Oswald acted alone. In 1991, filmmaker Oliver Stone tapped into these doubts, and added his own paranoid twist, to create the popular movie, JFK. The film portrayed an elaborate web of conspiracy involving Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, the FBI, the CIA, the Pentagon, the KGB, pro-Castro and anti-Castro forces, defense contractors, and assorted other officials and agencies. The movie makes it seem that First Lady Jackie Kennedy was the only person in Dealey Plaza that day who was not planning to murder the President. The movie ended with a plea for audience members to ask Congress to open all Kennedy assassination records. The plea worked. In 1992, Congress passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act that placed all remaining government documents pertaining to the assassination in a special category and loosened the normal classification guidelines. It set a 25-year deadline for the release of all documents. That deadline was October 26, 2017. CONTINUE READING: www.history.com/news/why-the-public-stopped-believing-the-government-about-jfks-murder?cmpid=TWITTER_TWITTER__20171030&linkId=44118387
|
|
|
Post by jcurio on Oct 31, 2017 12:45:41 GMT -6
And Castro is dead, too.
Absurd. Not “15 minutes of fame”. But 25 years? Whoa! Where did I get the “25 years”?
The article above, SAYS “lone gunman” more than once, as IF that is everbidies prime concern with the case. You know wat I mean. Lone gunman as, he wasn’t hired by anyone; etc.
Do our kids care about this case, at all? Or are they just acutely aware, that this world is insanely corrupt?
|
|
|
Post by swamprat on Oct 31, 2017 13:20:04 GMT -6
"And Castro is dead, too."
Yep! Sigh..... I really MISS my buddy!
|
|
|
Post by jcurio on Oct 31, 2017 13:38:07 GMT -6
Ha! Unable to post the comment I wanted to!
😂
|
|
whatwouldyousuggest
Junior Member
I once was...I am again..I always will be....all hail the personal opinion
Posts: 121
|
Post by whatwouldyousuggest on Nov 1, 2017 11:05:12 GMT -6
We have corruption in our government and within the various branches of it. Why would the kids of today care about the bs of back then when there is terrorism today to be concerned with or N Korea and it's lovely bombs? Where ever powerful men and women gather...there WILL be manipulation and corruption..blackmail...treason...and so on. It's what big money does. Best to remember though..the no one is untouchable. Kennedy was a wealthy and powerful man from a well known powerful family..it didn't save him. It doesn't matter who killed him. They are either dead now or beyond culpability.
There is a lot written on conspiracy theories and ties to mental illness or paranoia...I think people just are not satisfied with the answers sometimes. Why though? What would it achieve to discover (purely theoretical) that Lyndon B Johnson had Kennedy shot so he could be president? What would we do? We can't go back in time and change history...can't convict him of a crime..he's dead. Is it just to find the answer to a mystery? To defame his family?
Sort of like the government and aliens. What would you do if there was some involvement...how would it change your life? Or do you just jump up and down happy that you KNEW it all the time? I dunno. I feel rather the same with all of the 'assault' charges being made years and even decades later. Did you file a report? Get a rape kit? Did you continue to work for this slime bucket? In a LOT of cases they kept right on working with them or going back for more 'interviews'. How are you supposed to react to that? For years..not a peep and now...it's a bad thing? I don't grok it. If something gives you offense..you react NOW. Yes? No?
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Nov 11, 2017 23:09:41 GMT -6
www.cnn.com/2017/11/09/politics/jfk-file-cia-nsa-release/index.html?sr=twCNNp110917jfk-file-cia-nsa-release0447PMStory&CNNPolitics=Tw Government releases another JFK troveBy Eli Watkins, CNN / www.cnn.com/profiles/eli-watkins Thu November 9, 2017 WATCH VIDEO: www.cnn.com/2017/11/09/politics/jfk-file-cia-nsa-release/index.html?sr=twCNNp110917jfk-file-cia-nsa-release0447PMStory&CNNPolitics=TwWashington (CNN)The government made thousands of files related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy public on Thursday, marking the latest installment in the collection's delayed release. Many of the documents in Thursday's release show the intelligence community grappling with -- and griping about -- investigations into the assassination, and further underscore covert activities in the Cold War. Thursday's release included nearly 13,000 CIA documents, all formerly withheld in part except for two, and more than 200 NSA documents previously postponed from release on the original deadline last month. In one 1963 file, the CIA refers to knowledge about Lee Harvey Oswald's infamous visit to Mexico City prior to the Kennedy assassination and the reaction from the agency when the news came that Oswald was the potential assassin. "When the name of Lee Oswald was heard, the effect was electric," wrote John Whitten of the CIA. Seeking to shed light on the assassination, Congress passed a law in 1992 mandating the release of all secret files related to the Kennedy assassination and gave the government 25 years to do so, leaving the decision to further withhold the files up to the sitting president. The 25-year deadline hit in October, and President Donald Trump at first decided to release most, but prevent some of the documents from being released. Trump went on to say all files would become public, with some names being withheld. Thursday's release was the latest publication of the secret files, following a release of files last week and another batch released on the deadline last month. Tangentially related recordsThe collection includes many files only tangentially related to the Kennedy assassination, including documents on US activities in Cuba and the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., which was examined alongside the Kennedy assassination by a congressional committee. Some provide details about the intelligence community's more controversial activities. One document, for example, shows that the CIA knew of a Bulgarian independence activist confined in a military hospital in Panama under the false pretense of being a psychopath. The activist drew the attention of Greek authorities, French intelligence and the CIA. The file referred to him alternatively as Kelly, D.A. Dimitrov and Gen. Donald A. Donaldson. The document said the US "was considering an 'ARTICHOKE' approach to Kelly to see if it would be possible to reorient Kelly favorably" by dispatching agency doctors to drug him and change his behavior, but ultimately decided to do nothing. Project Artichoke was a predecessor to Project MKUltra, an experimental CIA mind control program. The 1977 file put together the information on the Bulgarian because the "apparently alive" independence activist was talking about the Kennedy assassination. Documents in previous releases showed the US considering putting lives on the line in Cuba in an effort to pressure the Castro-led Cuban government. www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32105759.pdfCNN's Wade Payson-Denney contributed to this report. WATCH VIDEO: www.cnn.com/2017/11/09/politics/jfk-file-cia-nsa-release/index.html?sr=twCNNp110917jfk-file-cia-nsa-release0447PMStory&CNNPolitics=Tw
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Apr 15, 2020 13:58:14 GMT -6
mysteriousuniverse.org/2020/04/jfk-john-keel-and-the-controversial-umbrella-man-a-strange-saga/ JFK, John Keel and the Controversial “Umbrella Man” – A Strange Sagaby Nick Redfern / mysteriousuniverse.org/author/nredfern/April 16, 2020 The Umbrella Man In an article titled “The Mysterious Umbrella Man Who Conspiracy Theorists Think Signaled JFK’s Assassination,” Katie Serena wrote: “As Kennedy’s presidential limousine passed by, carrying driver Agent Bill Greer, Agent Roy Kellerman, Governor John Connally, Nellie Connally, President Kennedy and Jackie Kennedy, onlookers waved and attempted to get the president’s attention. Some had small flags, some had handkerchiefs, but most waved their own hands or hats. One onlooker, however, had something far more interesting. As Kennedy’s limo rolled past, the onlooker opened a black umbrella and lifted it into the air.” The theory among a number of JFK assassination researchers is that the man was using the umbrella to signal someone – possibly a gunman, or even several – that the assassination was a definitive “Go.” Business Insider, in 2011, said in an online feature titled “NY Times’ Umbrella Man Exposed”: “There was even the September 1975 Senate intelligence committee testimony by Charles Senseney, a contract weapons designer for the CIA, that the agency had perfected an umbrella that shoots undetectable poison darts that can immobilize and kill, raising questions about whether this was in play that day.” A lot of mystery surrounded the “Umbrella Man.” That is, until 1978 when he came forward. Out of the shadows, we might say. He was identified as Louie Steven Witt. It turns out that 1978 was also the year in which a special House Select Committee on Assassinations dug deep into the matter of who killed JFK. As a result, Witt agreed to be interviewed. The interview was undertaken by Robert Genzman, the staff counsel to the committee. At howstuffworks, there’s this: “Witt disliked JFK’s father, former U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom Joseph P. Kennedy, whom he faulted for supporting British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement policies toward Hitler. Chamberlain’s trademark was his ever-present umbrella, and Witt chose that day to brandish a big, conspicuous one in an effort to needle the president. He brought along a visual aid to the hearing — a battered black umbrella that he claimed was the one he’d used that day. A committee staffer popped it open, to reveal that it didn’t contain a weapon.” Let’s now take a look at some of Witt’s words: “Actually, I was going to use this umbrella to heckle the President’s motorcade…Being a conservative-type fellow, I sort of placed him in the liberal camp and I was just going to kind of do a little heckling.” Witt continued: “…every day I walk someplace, and looking back the only reason I can account for my going that direction as opposed to the other direction would be since I was carrying that stupid umbrella, intent to heckling the President, and not being a person who was given to – prior to this time – doing things that would bring myself into notice, the only thing I can say is that I went down the street where I assumed there would be fewer people, because the buildings on the west end of the street, or the lower end, were either low buildings or low buildings where there were not a lot of people. I ended up turning left and going down into what is known as Dealey Plaza. The only reason I can think that I ended up down there was possibly I looked down there and saw an area where there were not a large group of people. There were people in that area but there was also in this area which later became known as the grassy knoll, there was no one out in that area in any great number.” The Q&A between Witt and Genzman continued: GENZMAN: “Did President Kennedy see your umbrella?” WITT: “I have no way of knowing. I really don’t.” GENZMAN: “What do you next recall happening?” WITT: “Let me go back a minute. As I was moving forward I apparently had this umbrella in front of me for some few steps. Whereas other people I understand saw the President shot and his movements; I did not see this because of this thing in front of me, The next thing I saw after I saw the car coming down the street, down the hill to my left, the car was just about at a position like this [indicating] at this angle here. At this time there was the car stopping, the screeching of tires, the jamming on of brakes, motorcycle patrolman right there beside one of the cars. One car ran upon the President’s car and a man jumped off and jumped on the back. These were the scenes that unfolded as I reached the point to where I was seeing things.” GENZMAN: “What did you hear at that time? Did you hear voices?” WITT: “I don’t recall any voices at that particular time. After I finally became aware that something had happened, you know, something terrible had happened, I just sat down. I was standing on the retaining wall, and I just sat down, just right straight down, and apparently – I don’t know if I had laid the umbrella down or dropped it or what I did. Nevertheless, I think it ended up on the sidewalk and I just sat there. Some of the things that I recall, one of the things I remember seeing while standing, there was a couple, I looked down to the right and there was a man and a woman, and they were covering some children, they were lying down and they were covering the children with their bodies and this may have caused me to sit down or I may have just sat down because I was stunned. Because there for a few minutes or for a few seconds at least I didn’t seem to be able to collect my thoughts. Sometime later after the cars moved out, this is when all this activity in the cars stopping and the cars moved out, I recall a man sitting down to my right and he said something like: They done shot them folks. He repeated it two or three times but it was repetitious of him saying the same thing.” The story gets weirder. Surreal, even. As Doug Skinner notes at JohnKeel.com: “One of John’s more intriguing abandoned projects is ‘The Return of the Umbrella Man,’ a proposal for a novel. The Umbrella Man, of course, was the mysterious man with the umbrella at Kennedy’s assassination, long an object of speculation by assassination researchers. In 1978, he was identified as Louie Steven Witt, who had simply picked a particularly bad time to protest Joseph Kennedy’s support of Neville Chamberlain.” Doug adds: “In 1977, however, John cooked up an idea for a novel, making him a spirit who was repeatedly killed, only to walk in to other host bodies. The premise allowed John to have some fun with a plot brimming with sex, violence, conspiracy, poltergeists, walk-ins, organized crime, mysterious cartels, the Elks, and the Kennedy assassination. And, for good measure, funny underwear. In later years, he often lamented that fictionalized forteana was more commercial than reportage; and that ‘The X-Files’ and ‘Men In Black’ were lifting plot points from his books. ‘The Return of the Umbrella Man’ was an attempt to create an entertainment using some of the same paranormal material.” To be sure, a very strange saga! mysteriousuniverse.org/2020/04/jfk-john-keel-and-the-controversial-umbrella-man-a-strange-saga/
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Aug 10, 2022 18:21:54 GMT -6
Jul 28, 2022
JFK's Memo to NASA... Just Ten Days Before Assassination | NASA's Unexplained Files
|
|