|
MOON
Jan 15, 2012 4:31:12 GMT -6
Post by AaronFarquhar on Jan 15, 2012 4:31:12 GMT -6
Check this video out, I found a little boring at first but skip to 14 minutes and then listen on, He speaks about the moon aswell and whats up there,
Tell me your opinion
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
MOON
Jan 17, 2012 11:42:29 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2012 11:42:29 GMT -6
An interesting video Aaron.
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 17, 2012 12:21:13 GMT -6
Post by auntym on Jan 17, 2012 12:21:13 GMT -6
www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2104483,00.html Lunar Liquid: More Water than Ever Found on the Surface of the Moon[/color] By Jeffrey Kluger Tuesday, Jan. 17, 2012 There are a whole lot of forbidding places in the solar system, but the permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) of the moon have to be near the top of the list. Found in the northern and southern lunar poles, the PSRs are low-lying spots — often deep in the bowls of craters — that never receive so much as a breath of warmth or a flicker of light from the sun. As a result, they don't go through the same heating and cooling cycle as the rest of the moon, where temperatures soar to 200°F during lunar daylight and plunge to –200°F at night. Instead, the PSRs remain in an unending deep freeze. These images produced by the Lyman Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP) aboard NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter reveal features at the Moon's northern and southern poles in the regions that lie in perpetual darkness. They show many permanently shadowed regions, or PSRs, are darker at far-ultraviolet wavelengths (top inset) and redder than nearby surface areas that receive sunlight (bottom inset). The darker PSR regions are consistent with having large surface porosities — indicating "fluffy" soils — while the reddening is consistent with the presence of water frost on the surface. Lyman Alpha Mapping Project That ought to make those areas unlikely places for astronauts ever to visit, much less settle — except for one little wrinkle: if there happened to be water ice nearly anywhere on the surface of the moon, it would boil away the instant it felt the solar fires; at the poles it would last forever. In 2010, scientists discovered that even at lower latitudes, the moon is not entirely dry, with faint traces of ice surviving beneath the surface, making lunar soil about twice as wet as the sands of the Sahara — which by moon standards is practically drenched. Now, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has found that the PSRs indeed have a whole lot more water than that, with up to 2% of the surface in those blacked-out regions consisting of ice crystals. Read more: www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2104483,00.html#ixzz1jjzWE3HG
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
MOON
Jan 18, 2012 10:45:39 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2012 10:45:39 GMT -6
Well I'm sure not going to settle in those places when I move to the moon
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 25, 2012 21:50:00 GMT -6
Post by auntym on Jan 25, 2012 21:50:00 GMT -6
www.openminds.tv/newt-gingrich-wants-moon-colonies-875/ Newt Gingrich wants Moon colonies Mitt Romney Wants to Commercialize Space[/color] Jason McClellan | Jan 25, 2012 Space travel, space exploration, and the search for extraterrestrial life were hot topics in 2011, and these topics will be discussed even more in 2012. Current space exploration projects, planned missions, private space companies, and the emergence of the space tourism industry are all contributing to the new space race, as countries around the world are pushing to put more people in space and on celestial bodies. The space topic was brought up at the recent 2012 Republican Candidates Debate in Florida. When asked about the space race, Newt Gingrich stated that he would like to see the U.S. go back to the Moon permanently, implying the colonization of the Moon, and he thinks a priority should be “getting to Mars as soon as possible.” He also shared his opinion that “building a series of space stations and developing commercial space” is something the U.S. should do. Mitt Romney also stated that space travel should be a priority for the country. TO SEE VIDEO & CONTINUE READING: www.openminds.tv/newt-gingrich-wants-moon-colonies-875/
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 26, 2012 19:55:11 GMT -6
Post by auntym on Jan 26, 2012 19:55:11 GMT -6
www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2012/01/newt-lightyear-gingrich-promis.html Newt 'Lightyear' Gingrich promises moon base by 2020David Shiga, reporter 26 January 2012 Newt Gingrich - who already goes by the nickname Newt Skywalker - says he will get a moon base built by the end of 2020 if he is elected president. First, of course, he'll need to develop a viable way of getting there - with the retirement of the space shuttle fleet, NASA doesn't even have a way of getting to the International Space Station on its own. Gingrich made the moon base pledge in a speech in Cocoa, Florida, while campaigning to become the Republican Party's nominee for president. After complaining that NASA is moving too slowly and inefficiently, he said he wanted to see a bolder course of action. Perhaps Newt Lightyear is a better nickname for the former House speaker. "By the end of my second term, we will have the first permanent base on the moon and it will be American," he said. Gingrich said that he would like to eventually see a colony established on the moon, though he did not give a timeline for achieving it. He added that he had once proposed legislation that would allow a moon colony of at least 13,000 Americans to petition to become a US state, and that he still supported the idea. I don't recall, incidentally, what the proposed state would be called - perhaps readers could suggest names in the comments below. In any case, the Gingrich plan faces some difficult - some might say insurmountable - hurdles. Under George W Bush, NASA was trying to build a moon base by 2020, but a panel of experts appointed by the Obama administration in 2009 said in a report that it would take much longer and cost more than initially estimated - and Obama eventually canned the idea. By the end of 2020, Gingrich said he would also have a fast vehicle developed to send astronauts to Mars. "I'm sick of being told that we have to be timid and have to be limited to technologies that are 50 years old," he said. Previous estimates for the price of a manned mission to Mars have been in the hundreds of billions - "something like $450 billion" he said. But he said he would get the necessary technology developed largely by setting up prizes worth $10 billion. CONTINUE READING: www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2012/01/newt-lightyear-gingrich-promis.html
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 26, 2012 22:05:26 GMT -6
Post by skywalker on Jan 26, 2012 22:05:26 GMT -6
Newt Lightyear definitely has his brain in overdrive. He comes up with a zillion different plans for everything. Some of them are actually pretty good. It will be interesting to see what he actually does if he manages to get elected.
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 28, 2012 12:52:33 GMT -6
Post by auntym on Jan 28, 2012 12:52:33 GMT -6
www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/01/-was-the-moon-once-powered-by-a-long-lived-dynamic-core-mit-research-says-yes.htmlWas the Moon Once Powered by a Dynamo Core? MIT Research Says "Yes"January 27, 2012 MIT's research on an ancient lunar rock suggests that the moon once harbored a long-lived dynamo — a molten, convecting core of liquid metal that generated a strong magnetic field 3.7 billion years ago. The findings, published today in Science, point to a dynamo that lasted much longer than scientists previously thought, and suggest that an alternative energy source may have powered the dynamo. “The moon has this protracted history that’s surprising,” says co-author Benjamin Weiss, an associate professor of planetary science at MIT. “This provides evidence of a fundamentally new way of making a magnetic field in a planet a new power source.” The new paper is the latest piece in a puzzle that planetary scientists have been working out for decades. In 1969, the Apollo 11 mission brought the first lunar rocks back to Earth — souvenirs from Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin’s historic moonwalk. Since then, scientists have probed the rocky remnants for clues to the moon’s history. They soon discovered that many rocks were magnetized, which suggested that the moon was more than a cold, undifferentiated pile of space rubble. Instead, it may have harbored a convecting metallic core that produced a large magnetic field, recorded in the moon’s rocks. Exactly what powered the dynamo remains a mystery. One possibility is that the lunar dynamo was self-sustaining, like Earth’s: As the planet has cooled, its liquid core has moved in response, sustaining the dynamo and the magnetic field it produces. In the absence of a long-lived heat supply, most planetary bodies will cool within hundreds of millions of years of formation. A dynamo still exists within Earth because heat, produced by the radioactive decay of elements within the planet, maintains the core’s convection. Models have shown that if a lunar dynamo were powered solely by cooling of the moon’s interior, it would have been able to sustain itself only for a few hundred million years after the moon formed — dissipating by 4.2 billion years ago, at the very latest. However, Weiss and his colleagues found some surprising evidence in a bit of lunar basalt dubbed 10020. The Apollo 11 astronauts collected the rock at the southwestern edge of the Sea of Tranquility; scientists believe it was likely ejected from deep within the moon 100 million years ago, after a meteor impact. The group confirmed previous work dating the rock at 3.7 billion years old, and found that it was magnetized — a finding that clashes with current dynamo models. CONTINUE READING: www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/01/-was-the-moon-once-powered-by-a-long-lived-dynamic-core-mit-research-says-yes.html
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 29, 2012 2:30:53 GMT -6
Post by AaronFarquhar on Jan 29, 2012 2:30:53 GMT -6
Gingrich wont have a moon base built, well i dont think so anyways. Obama said that if he is elected president than he will bring all troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan? Well then how come when he was elected it took so long to do it? I have come to the theory that all these possible president elects have no idea whats going on, They cant look into the books and see what the real issues are until they become president and obtain the security clearance. If building a moon base was such a good idea then how come the president or who ever is in charge has not got it going yet? If he is elected president, I bet you any money that he will then sit down with the joint chiefs or who ever it is he talks to and find out exactly what is happening in space, on the moon and the whole UFO subject, When he looks into it and finds out exactly whats going on (What ever it is) he will be like "Oh, well in that case we cant do that so scrap that idea" The whole point of my post is, so many possible elects say that if they become president, they will do this, they will change the world, they will get our guys out of there and so on, But they dont realize that all the things that are happening now are being done for a certain reason. Until they become president and look behind the scenes i wont believe what they say and do until i see it for myself. Did that make sense or was that just babbling??
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 29, 2012 6:14:53 GMT -6
Post by Steve on Jan 29, 2012 6:14:53 GMT -6
Hi Aaron, I tend to agree with you. Certainly don't judge our work in progress nation based on our absurd television programs around. I think the only ones that watch them actually are those overseas assuming we watch them. Most don't. Just exporting Bargain basement junk television. I appologize for the junk our programming falsely depicts about Americans. As for Gingrich, he is so out of touch. He is basically looking for a cause to rally Americans around, but it won't be to rally around resuming manned expeditions to the Moon, but really to get people to rally putting himself in the White House. Using people as he has done many times, including his two ex wives. This is the continuing disingenuous thing about Gingrich. If Gingrich was remotely ever in a position to take us again somehow to the Moon, it will be only be to personally maroon him there hopefully IMO. In the movie MIB, they refer to Gingrich comically as an alien anyway. As far as UFO revaluations learned when a President gets his initial National security briefs, I am of the opinion that might surprise or upset many. Based on a number of things leads me to the strong impression that the whole UFO subject is actually of 'somewhat significant' interest in relative priority to the US government and other world governments, but that interest is really primary because they know so little themselves about it! It is such an unimaginably complex and wide ranging phenomenon. I think they know the phenomenon in those rare cases is quite real, but are clueless with no one really in charge. This defies most conspiracy 'foam at the mouth' types, but what I have in limited access seen and experienced, there are more questions than ever, and few answers than ever. Thinking that someone secretly IS in charge ironically gives many conspiracy people less insomnia. Many books out there, but nothing to really show anyone is really in charge. Certainly no UFO organization laughably anywhere is in charge. I have quietly continued to investigate, doing some unique experiments, working mostly with experiencers and have seen myself a low grade UFO sighting to know something off the Earth is visiting here. To my astonishment, I just started reading John Alexanders controversial and well written book. I am glad I formed some opinions before reading it. We seem to have independantly concluded on our own and agree about many things it turns out, not that my view matters that much. I will see from reading this book to learn if my opinions need to modified again. I think the US Government is definitely working behind the scenes on UFOs, the JAL 747 incident over Alaska being one glaring example, Rendalshem is another, but not sure there is any evidence anyone has done much more than continue to gather information. But actively working with ET's at underground area 51 bases? Maybe Gindrich is an alien after all? ;D Steve
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 29, 2012 10:21:53 GMT -6
Post by skywalker on Jan 29, 2012 10:21:53 GMT -6
I think that one of Gingrich's main problems is that he has 15 zillion ideas zipping through his brain and he can't ever fully think any of them through. He just says whatever he happens to be thinking about at the moment. That doesn't mean that I wouldn't vote for him against Obama though. If Gingrich's pet poodle were running against Obama I would vote for the poodle. I don't see any reason to put a base on the Moon either. We have already been there and seen that there is nothing there. We have also already built a space station and demonstrated that people can live in space for extended periods of times. What would be the point of building another station on the Moon? I'm all in favor of exploring space and making new discoveries but we don't need to keep discovering the same things over and over again. We have already boldly gone to the Moon...now it is time to boldly go where no man has gone before...someplace like Mars for instance. Let's find out what is there, and if there is nothing interesting then we can move on to the next rock.
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 29, 2012 13:19:49 GMT -6
Post by auntym on Jan 29, 2012 13:19:49 GMT -6
i always wondered why we didn't have a base on the moon.... it never made any sense to me .... we have bases in most of the other countries on earth.... why not the moon? i always believed we were warned off the moon ... OR we are already on the dark side of the moon with the aliens.... in reality.... i really believe we already have a colony on the dark side of the moon.... i just can't figure out why the government is keeping it a secret... time will tell...
|
|
|
MOON
Jan 29, 2012 14:42:35 GMT -6
Post by swamprat on Jan 29, 2012 14:42:35 GMT -6
Let me chime in here just a bit. Putting a colony on the moon is a very worthwhile endeavor, just as most of our "space exploration" program is a worthwhile endeavor. Why? Two key reasons. Reason # 1: Mankind is a curious animal. We cannot live up to our potential as a species if we do not respond to that curiosity with scientific research and exploration. Although many folks feel we should not spend billions of dollars on such activity unless or until no one on Earth is hungry or poor, philosophers will tell you we "need" to respond to that curiosity trait; there are intangible benefits to humanity. ESPECIALLY SINCE THERE IS REASON # 2! Reason # 2: The tangible benefits are so great as to be incalculable. Every scientific experiment, every exploration mission adds to our knowledge of physics and the physical world. There are those who have tried to identify and itemize every improvement to human existence that was a direct result of the space program. They quickly run out of paper. From the early days of rocketry, from the “fire arrow” used by the Chin Tartars in 1232 AD for fighting off a Mongol assault on Kai-feng-fu, to the Congreve rockets (of “rockets’ red glare” fame) used by the British in the War of 1812, to Von Braun and the German V-2, to Sputnik, to Mercury, to Voyager, to Apollo and the moon. From MIR to the ISS and from Hubble to Keppler and beyond. Every one of these programs benefited society in tangible ways. And now, let me give you just one example of one of the newest potential benefits----please watch Kirk Sorensen when you can spare 10 minutes. Listen carefully; he says a lot quickly. www.ted.com/talks/kirk_sorensen_thorium_an_alternative_nuclear_fuel.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
MOON
Jan 29, 2012 14:44:40 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2012 14:44:40 GMT -6
My two favorite political figures, Herman Cain and Sarah Palin (I think I am the only Alaskan who still likes her after all those media assaults on her... because I still remember the great things she did for Alaska... ) are both endorsing Newt Skywalker. ;D If Mr. Cain and Auntie Sarah like him, I like him too. ;D That's all I have to say on THAT subject... About the base on the moon... who knows?
|
|
|
MOON
Mar 27, 2012 12:01:16 GMT -6
Post by auntym on Mar 27, 2012 12:01:16 GMT -6
www.history.com/news/2012/03/27/where-does-the-moon-come-from/?cmpid=Social_twitter_Hith_03272012_1Published: March 27, 2012 By editor Where Does the Moon Come From?New research has cast doubt on the prevailing theory about how the moon came into being. Find out more about the study and several other lunar origin hypotheses set forth by scientists over the years. (Credit: NASA) Earth smashed into Planet Theia. Known as the giant impact hypothesis, the reigning lunar origin theory holds that the moon formed when Earth collided with a planet half its size—roughly as big as Mars—some 4.5 billion years ago. (Scientists call this imagined planet Theia after the deity who gave birth to the moon goddess in ancient Greek mythology.) The crash caused debris from both celestial bodies to orbit Earth—then a ball of partly molten rock rather than the solid orb we know today—and eventually coalesce to create the moon. Dating back to the mid-1970s, this model implies that the moon is an amalgam of materials from both Earth and Theia. A study published March 25 in the journal Nature Geoscience called the giant impact hypothesis into question by showing that the moon’s composition is nearly identical to Earth’s, suggesting that another planet had little or no contribution after all. The moon once filled the Pacific Ocean’s basin. Charles Darwin’s son George, an astronomer and physicist, first proposed the fission theory of moon formation in the late 1800s. According to this hypothesis, a chunk of matter spun off from a whirling Earth early in the history of the solar system and became our planet’s satellite. Geologist Osmond Fisher took the concept a step further, proposing that the Pacific Ocean occupies the space once filled by the moon. It wasn’t until well into the 20th century that fission fell out of favor, partly because scientists determined that a force capable of dislodging a moon-sized piece of Earth would have destroyed the planet. Lunar rocks collected during the Apollo missions indicated that the moon was once hotter than Earth, offering more evidence against fission. Earth ensnared a drifting moon. According to the capture theory, the moon formed elsewhere in the solar system and happened to hurtle past Earth at just the right moment. As a result, Earth’s gravitational field “captured” the moon and brought it into orbit. Scientists now believe an object as large as the moon would have broken apart or bounced off after encountering the forces surrounding Earth. They also consider it unlikely that conditions would have allowed such an auspicious meeting. Earth and the moon were twins. The condensation or co-accretion hypothesis states that the moon and Earth were born at the same time, sprouting from a single cloud of material within the original nebula that created the entire solar system. This event would have taken place shortly after the Big Bang some 13 billion years ago. If co-accretion formed Earth and the moon, however, gravitational forces would have fused both celestial bodies or they would share more basic characteristics, experts now think. CONTINUE READING: www.history.com/news/2012/03/27/where-does-the-moon-come-from/?cmpid=Social_twitter_Hith_03272012_1
|
|
|
MOON
May 4, 2012 12:36:43 GMT -6
Post by auntym on May 4, 2012 12:36:43 GMT -6
|
|
|
MOON
May 5, 2012 12:59:08 GMT -6
Post by auntym on May 5, 2012 12:59:08 GMT -6
|
|
|
MOON
May 5, 2012 13:58:59 GMT -6
Post by auntym on May 5, 2012 13:58:59 GMT -6
ScienceCasts: The Super Moon of May 2012 [/color] Published on Mar 9, 2012 by ScienceAtNASA Visit science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/02may_supermoon/ for more. Another "super-Moon" is in the offing. The perigee full Moon in May will be as much as 14% bigger and 30% brighter than other full moons of 2012. Super Moon 2012 (splash) A ScienceCast video explains the facts and fiction of "super-moons
|
|
pigswillfly
New Member
Would you like to know more?
Posts: 69
|
MOON
May 5, 2012 22:03:04 GMT -6
Post by pigswillfly on May 5, 2012 22:03:04 GMT -6
That was interesting. I saw the moon last night, and Venus which was superbright, shortly after sunset.
|
|
|
MOON
May 5, 2012 22:12:08 GMT -6
Post by skywalker on May 5, 2012 22:12:08 GMT -6
I watched the super moon as I was out running a little while ago. It rose up over the horizon all big and round and orange. Now the man in the moon is up there staring down at me probably wondering why I can't see him.
|
|
|
MOON
May 6, 2012 12:51:54 GMT -6
Post by auntym on May 6, 2012 12:51:54 GMT -6
rt.com/news/supermoon-lunar-perigee-photos-688/ One night of ‘Supermoonlight’: Best views (FANTASTIC PHOTOS)[/color] Published: 06 May, 2012 The full moon rises behind a mosque as birds fly in Amman May 5, 2012. (Reuters / Ali Jarekji) Saturday night on planet Earth was marked with spectacular phenomenon – an unusually large and bright moon crossing the skies. For those whose vision was not obscured with clouds it became a truly memorable event. The recently-coined term ‘Supermoon’ describes a situation when the moon is passing Earth at the closest point its elliptic orbit – the perigee. The farthest sector of lunar elliptic orbit is called the apogee. When in perigee, moon is a “mere” 356,955 kilometers away from us. At this distance, Earth’s only natural satellite is 14 per cent larger and 16 per cent brighter than an average full moon we usually observe. In apogee the moon is 406,450 kilometers from Earth. This means in perigee the moon gets closer to us by 49,495 km, which is nothing by space scale, but still considerably longer than the length of our planet’s equator. In 2012, the Supermoon coincided with the annual Eta Aquarid meteor shower peak and outshone this also very spectacular celestial event. Probably because of the atmospheric lensing effect, the moon looks bigger when it is closer to the horizon. Still, it is not as big as on the photos of experienced photographers who use telephoto lenses or telescopes to magnify tremendously the size of the natural satellite, making it looming in a sci-fi manner over chosen landscape. Do not cherish an illusion that one day you will see anything similar for real – the naked eye always sees the moon the same way. A runner makes his way along a trail on a butte in front of the "super Moon" at Papago Park in Phoenix, Arizona May 5, 2012. (Reuters / Darryl Webb) Tourists look at the moon rising over the ancient temple of Poseidon at cape Sounion, some 60 kms south of Athens, on May 5, 2012. (AFP Photo / Aris Messinis) SEE MORE PICTURES & CONTINUE READING: rt.com/news/supermoon-lunar-perigee-photos-688/
|
|
|
MOON
Aug 15, 2012 10:50:22 GMT -6
Post by auntym on Aug 15, 2012 10:50:22 GMT -6
UFO Activity On MOON!100% Undeniable Proof[/color] Published on Aug 15, 2012 by timw1959 I made this shorter version with no music so now everyone can watch it without the headache with some.Please watch the response video showing rolling video of the main event,as well as still frames.Here is your PROOF!!The responce to this video is the original footage!In the "LANGRENUS"crater you will see activity!!Watch the deep crater on your right.The movements are easy to see if you watch just that spot.Once you have seen what to look for,Review the video again and see the MULTIPLE other places of activity.Undeniable PROOF!!!Watching the entire clip,you will see PROOF!!!Although it seems something or someone is fiddling with the images!Their losing their visual sharpness!!The more suttle things are in the beginning,but keep watching to see PROOF!!!All pics are In the crater,"LANGRENUS"is AWESOME!!It's 100% real. keep your eyes open.You'll be surprized.The original clip is available to view.Watch what you missed here.I'm Amazed!Sorry about the comment thing,but it has to be!If you want to pull the dirt on the lens,Explain the the dissruption on the Moon itself! tblnfilms.com/MoonRising.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
MOON
Aug 15, 2012 16:35:50 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2012 16:35:50 GMT -6
I'm afraid that could easily be photo shopped..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
MOON
Aug 15, 2012 18:16:38 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2012 18:16:38 GMT -6
' If ' by chance these objects were authentic they would be enormous.
|
|
|
MOON
Aug 16, 2012 20:55:40 GMT -6
Post by skywalker on Aug 16, 2012 20:55:40 GMT -6
If they were that obvious a million people would have seen them by now. People have scopes pointed at the moon all the time and those craters are right in plain sight for everybody to see.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
MOON
Aug 16, 2012 23:06:07 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2012 23:06:07 GMT -6
There is a tool I have for my sites that animates..it could have easily done that. Wasn't me.
|
|
|
MOON
Aug 18, 2012 10:32:01 GMT -6
Post by skywalker on Aug 18, 2012 10:32:01 GMT -6
Don't worry, Jo. Your secret is safe.
|
|
|
MOON
Aug 18, 2012 22:23:54 GMT -6
Post by lois on Aug 18, 2012 22:23:54 GMT -6
I have never crossed out the idea completely that Neil Armstrong walked into buildings on the moon. Has that film ever been proven a hoax. I have waited a long time .. If there is structures no wonder we never went back.
Or have we? Any secret mission I believe would have leaked out by now. There is no way a launch could take place without eye witnesses. It is only a moon for our planet like all moons in the universe. I don't believe life ever lived there. Maybe a base of some kind. If aliens have built bases on earth why not the moon? It would be a most likely place.
What degrees is it on the moon? I don't recollect anyone telling it . Or I just seem to have really missed it.
|
|
|
MOON
Aug 18, 2012 22:28:33 GMT -6
Post by lois on Aug 18, 2012 22:28:33 GMT -6
Speaking of the moon, I caught something in the sky in the direction of the moon in Cape when we were down there. A very freaky thing when I enlarge it. Appears to me to resemble a robot with antlers. lol.. also after a blue flash that seemed to go over the moon.. orbs appeared. I taped it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
MOON
Aug 19, 2012 21:31:38 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2012 21:31:38 GMT -6
What degrees is it on the moon? I don't recollect anyone telling it . Or I just seem to have really missed it. If you were standing on the moon when the sun was up, it would be hot enough to boil water. Within just a few minutes of the sun setting, the temperature would drop about 250 degrees.
|
|