Post by auntym on Jan 6, 2012 13:33:59 GMT -6
www.ufodigest.com/article/rebuttal-paper-%E2%80%9Cwould-contact-extraterrestrials-benefit-or-harm-humanity-scenario-analysis%E2%80%9D
Rebuttal to the paper, “Would Contact with Extraterrestrials Benefit or Harm Humanity? A Scenario Analysis”
Submitted by gaoshu999 on Fri, 01/06/2012
by Tim Jones
Regarding comments made in the paper, “Would Contact with Extraterrestrials Benefit or Harm Humanity? A Scenario Analysis”, by by Seth D. Baum, Jacob D. Haqq-Misra, Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman, sethbaum.com/ac/2011_ET-Scenarios.pdf it states that there has been no 'observation' or 'detection' of UFOs. However, it ignores an existing body of authentic, hard data, the veracity of which would hold up in a court of law. Examples of the type of information to which I am referring are air traffic controller's hard data and the resulting reports, indicating intelligently controlled solid objects performing aeronautical maneuvers well beyond the capabilities of the known aircraft our military possess.
Along with the hard data, there are corroborating eye witness reports by both commercial and military pilots and air traffic controllers, as to those same aeronautical maneuvers. An example of one of those reports is testimony given by John Callahan, former Division Chief of the Accidents and Investigations Branch of the FAA in Washington DC. In a 2001 Disclosure Conference Project* at the National Press Club, in Washington D.C., he testifies to the fact that in 1986, a Japanese Airlines 747 was followed by a UFO over Alaska for 31 minutes. For thirty-one of those minutes, there exist hard data, the air traffic controller's** experience in communication with the pilot and the pilot's eyewitness account.
Immediately following the event concerning the Japanese Airlines 747, John Callahan was asked to be present at a briefing. At the briefing, the CIA told all in the meeting that day, top FAA officials, CIA, military, (Reagan )White House Scientific Study Group and others, that 'this never happened', that they were sworn to secrecy, and the public cannot know.
There is only one conclusion John Callahan drew from his experience, “if it’s not the stealth bomber, then you know, it’s a UFO”. How is that the three authors can conclude (from the abstract of their paper) that, “While humanity has not yet observed any extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI), contact with ETI remains possible,” and (from the introduction of the same paper) that, “Humanity has not yet encountered or even detected any form of extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI)...” ?
CONTINUE READING: www.ufodigest.com/article/rebuttal-paper-%E2%80%9Cwould-contact-extraterrestrials-benefit-or-harm-humanity-scenario-analysis%E2%80%9D
Rebuttal to the paper, “Would Contact with Extraterrestrials Benefit or Harm Humanity? A Scenario Analysis”
Submitted by gaoshu999 on Fri, 01/06/2012
by Tim Jones
Regarding comments made in the paper, “Would Contact with Extraterrestrials Benefit or Harm Humanity? A Scenario Analysis”, by by Seth D. Baum, Jacob D. Haqq-Misra, Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman, sethbaum.com/ac/2011_ET-Scenarios.pdf it states that there has been no 'observation' or 'detection' of UFOs. However, it ignores an existing body of authentic, hard data, the veracity of which would hold up in a court of law. Examples of the type of information to which I am referring are air traffic controller's hard data and the resulting reports, indicating intelligently controlled solid objects performing aeronautical maneuvers well beyond the capabilities of the known aircraft our military possess.
Along with the hard data, there are corroborating eye witness reports by both commercial and military pilots and air traffic controllers, as to those same aeronautical maneuvers. An example of one of those reports is testimony given by John Callahan, former Division Chief of the Accidents and Investigations Branch of the FAA in Washington DC. In a 2001 Disclosure Conference Project* at the National Press Club, in Washington D.C., he testifies to the fact that in 1986, a Japanese Airlines 747 was followed by a UFO over Alaska for 31 minutes. For thirty-one of those minutes, there exist hard data, the air traffic controller's** experience in communication with the pilot and the pilot's eyewitness account.
Immediately following the event concerning the Japanese Airlines 747, John Callahan was asked to be present at a briefing. At the briefing, the CIA told all in the meeting that day, top FAA officials, CIA, military, (Reagan )White House Scientific Study Group and others, that 'this never happened', that they were sworn to secrecy, and the public cannot know.
There is only one conclusion John Callahan drew from his experience, “if it’s not the stealth bomber, then you know, it’s a UFO”. How is that the three authors can conclude (from the abstract of their paper) that, “While humanity has not yet observed any extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI), contact with ETI remains possible,” and (from the introduction of the same paper) that, “Humanity has not yet encountered or even detected any form of extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI)...” ?
CONTINUE READING: www.ufodigest.com/article/rebuttal-paper-%E2%80%9Cwould-contact-extraterrestrials-benefit-or-harm-humanity-scenario-analysis%E2%80%9D