sunbow
Full Member
Seeing, Dreaming, and Loving...
Posts: 859
|
Post by sunbow on Jan 12, 2014 14:48:10 GMT -6
I have been working with trying to learn animal communication. It seems to sometimes work. Of course the dogs are focused on getting treats, but there are times I believe they hear me. Me listening is more abstract. I believe that these skills are important for those who will end up interacting with ETs. Here is a thought - what if all the animals on our planet are telepathic and we are the only deaf creatures? Anna Breytenbach has a video which really spoke to me, but is no longer available for free. This was interesting: She has a few interviews on Sound Cloud: Anna on Sound Cloud
|
|
|
Post by skywalker on Jan 12, 2014 20:40:40 GMT -6
That was interesting. I do think that animals (probably all other life also)is telepathic to a certain extent. I wouldn't say that we humans are deaf because we are telepathic also, we just refuse to listen. It's like when people get a bad feeling about something but they refuse to pay attention to it because they rationalize it away...and end up getting eaten by a bear or killed in an accident. People need to put aside their technology and their smart phones and their knowledge and just listen with their hearts and their emotions for a moment or two. There's no telling what they might learn.
The question that I have about communicating with animals though is how would the communication take place. Do you think in English or in images or just think without thinking? Do animals understand human language if we think it rather than speak it? I would imagine that communicating with animals on our own planet would be pretty much the same as communicating with ETs from another planet. If we can solve the language barrier it would make communication much easier. Perhaps when we communicate telepathically there is no barrier. Maybe telepathic thought automatically becomes some form of "universal language" that is easily understood by all life forms.
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Jan 12, 2014 21:40:00 GMT -6
I have been working with trying to learn animal communication. It seems to sometimes work. Of course the dogs are focused on getting treats, but there are times I believe they hear me. Me listening is more abstract. I believe that these skills are important for those who will end up interacting with ETs. Here is a thought - what if all the animals on our planet are telepathic and we are the only deaf creatures? Anna Breytenbach has a video which really spoke to me, but is no longer available for free. This was interesting: . . <<deletia>> . . SunBow, happy NYrs to you! >....what if all the animals on our planet are telepathic and we are the only deaf creatures? Excellent question...it's my opinion, that ET work to keep us psychically unbalanced. In-fact, I suspect that its one of their planetary populace gene-pool maintenance agendas. Its obvious, at least to me, (and likely others) that ET are manipulating certain elements of the food chain and are monitoring through cattle mutilations. Further manipulation is via physical abduction, and later, after implantation, psychic abductions...possible for the sole purpose of to keeping our hemispheres unbalanced, lopsided. As ET craft operate in Yetzirah, they are invisible to Human (military) Asiyah based technology, yet the psychics are all aware of ET and their mecha, but they can't explain it...too right hemi, while the scientist types are too left hemi to either see and-or remember ET exhibitions. Curious state of affairs. And then, I've watched ET craft move from home to home, using a solid-light green-beam which descended down through the dimensions and from a high altitude, into the homes of those Humans who radiated a psychic-glow. The green-beam, touched their foreheads, after which the psychic-glow had ceased, and the beam was retracted. Since everything that is conscious, is also psychic, the only thing that prevents most Humans from being psychically aware is the ability to translate the information between the hemispheres. That's the purpose of the secret Ascension schools; --to teach Humans how to be 'awake' in both hemispheres, concurrently. Great question. plutronus
|
|
sunbow
Full Member
Seeing, Dreaming, and Loving...
Posts: 859
|
Post by sunbow on Jan 13, 2014 6:40:39 GMT -6
Some Animal communicators talk to their animals and get elaborate English returns. I do not get any of that. I use images and feelings. So my one dog is given to putting his head on my leg for either 'I want to go out' or "I want a dog bone treat". This requires no real psychic ability, but if I picture the treat clearly and send it, sometimes he immediately picks up his head and his eyes have a look of comprehension. It is the timing that implies to me that he received the message. The Llamas are more complex beings and do not really want to associate with humans in the way dogs do. They have a certain disdain for us, we are not part of the herd, also we are not vegetarians (by biology, though some omnivores choose that path). I am just learning to use these abilities, but have the current belief that they are real and valid. If we do not exercise our abilities, they will never develop into talents.
|
|
sunbow
Full Member
Seeing, Dreaming, and Loving...
Posts: 859
|
Post by sunbow on Jan 13, 2014 6:52:41 GMT -6
I am not sure about whether they are trying to increase our psychic ability (John Mack, Janet Colli) or are seeking to control us in one of the many variations. It is likely that there are more than one group and that the agendas differ. Many here have increased abilities, yet perhaps we were born with them and have had our experiences to knock them down or limit them through generated fear and life destabilization. But then again, we were opened up by our experiences and even though it is too much for us to handle, we were given a chance to absorb and unwind the vast download into our limited minds. We are challenged to grow. Stressors are the main engines of evolution. Facing the vastness of the galaxy and the endless possibilities is powerful medicine for changes.
If we believe that there was a war in 'the Heavens', who really won? Every victor paints themselves as saintly. The Earth is increasingly overpopulated and polluted. Is this just human greed (my belief) or are evil aliens controlling the world banks and government and if so, why? I could speculate endlessly, but from my estimation, human greed, driven by illusions that reality is mechanical materialism, seems to be the problem.
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Jan 13, 2014 16:20:16 GMT -6
That was interesting. I do think that animals (probably all other life also)is telepathic to a certain extent. I wouldn't say that we humans are deaf because we are telepathic also, we just refuse to listen. It's like when people get a bad feeling about something but they refuse to pay attention to it because they rationalize it away...and end up getting eaten by a bear or killed in an accident. People need to put aside their technology and their smart phones and their knowledge and just listen with their hearts and their emotions for a moment or two. There's no telling what they might learn. The question that I have about communicating with animals though is how would the communication take place. Do you think in English or in images or just think without thinking? Do animals understand human language if we think it rather than speak it? I would imagine that communicating with animals on our own planet would be pretty much the same as communicating with ETs from another planet. If we can solve the language barrier it would make communication much easier. Perhaps when we communicate telepathically there is no barrier. Maybe telepathic thought automatically becomes some form of "universal language" that is easily understood by all life forms. Hello SkyWalker, happy NwYrs to you! 'Telepathy' is a misnomer at best, as the Latin phrase implies distant information transfer between separated points, whereas, in reality, mind-to-mind information transfer...the message goes NO-WHERE, which is why the method is appears superluminal, exhibiting no 'transmitter-to-receiver' transient latency and is not range-power-limited. Mind is everywhere in the universe, --to 'send' a thought to another, is simply a matter of connecting with that mind. The transfer is instantaneous as the 'message' travels only inside your/everyone's Mind, it goes no-where. Its all taking place at the same party, God's Mind, in which everything conscious is a creature. We indivi-dually (indivisible-duality - from God) is a bit like modulation on an electric current that flows through all the lights, everything operates on same current, we are the modulation and God is the current. Everything has an 'address' to which one must 'tune' their intent to connect with specific people or things, etc. >...question I have...is how would the communication take place(?) How does one sense it? Information transferred thusly is sensed simply as a 'knowingness', its a bit like remembering a dream but not having the dream. It doesn't transmit in English or Dog, as the dog or God just knows the intent. Cheers
plutronus
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2014 3:12:25 GMT -6
Stressors are the main engines of evolution. When it comes to animals, I disagree. For them, and I guess by comparison maybe I should say "E.T.", I think their pattern of evolution is much different than ours. In other words, I have an idea that some species have a rate of mind/body evolution that flows continuously. I want to say that humans are either more erratic or stagnant, or stunted, and we've come to depend on stressors. I'm not saying that animals don't have stressors. Or that animals don't have a wide range of emotion. But, for example, I purposely don't get mad at my current dogs. I've tried it both ways; getting upset and using tone of voice or my behavior to let a former dog know it had upset me. I think that today's dogs, have a sense of right and wrong, no matter who has trained them, and their expectations of disapproval (If you have a loving relationship) are already there. I like to change it up . Is my dog going to "come" to me better if I use a stern voice? Or if I always call him to me, in a happy "come here, buddy!" tone, regardless of the situation? Maybe it is telepathy. I've already set the rules of who is master. I am going to get angry about even things totally unrelated to the dog. A loving dog has a sense of us beyond "get treat" or pats, or go outside, and it is a seemingly natural part of him/her. Some people might try to compare this to small children, and their attachment to a loved one. I don't. My childs emotional content as in regards to me, changes a great deal over a 20-40 year period (roughly).
|
|
sunbow
Full Member
Seeing, Dreaming, and Loving...
Posts: 859
|
Post by sunbow on Jan 16, 2014 8:32:41 GMT -6
In evolution, stressors are changes to the natural environment, so for dogs, being in the human world is an extreme stressor, as opposed to being wild and in a pack of dogs. Our dogs have not been wild for a long time and I would think have changed considerable. I would need to spend serious time with a wolf or fox or dingo to understand, but I am assuming they are much more adopted or evolved to be in our world.
We teach our dogs the knowledge of right and wrong, however they do possess an innate sense of love and loyalty: I agree, beyond wanting treats. They have a great deal to teach us. One of our illusions is that we are above them, yet all life is sacred and has spiritual lessons to teach.
I also do not get 'mad' at my dogs. I do have a stern voice for danger, but it is more of an urgency that I convey. They know that no matter what, they are part of the family, and they try very hard to be good in that sense. All three came from the humane society. Shanna, the oldest, was abused. Baily was abandoned. They still carry some scares from that. MacTavish was a puppy. He is carefree and the most telepathic: he knows I am trying. He also is in charge of the ducks and lets me know in the evening if I haven't locked them in their house at the proper time.
I agree, they cannot be compared to children.
|
|