|
Post by skywalker on Sept 7, 2014 18:15:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Sept 8, 2014 12:10:52 GMT -6
ufodigest.com/article/jack-the-ripper-0908JACK THE RIPPER DNA HOAX?By Peter Fotis Kapnistos September 8, 2014 In Russell Edwards’ new book, “Naming Jack the Ripper” (2014), Dr Jari Louhelainen said the killer’s DNA on a shawl was from the Polish-Jewish barber Aaron Kosminski. “However, scientists and scholars of the Ripper case have already cast doubt on Edwards and Louhelainen's specific claims, alleging that the evidence on the shawl is so compromised that any positive identification may be impossible.” In Russell Edwards’ new book, “Naming Jack the Ripper” (2014), Dr Jari Louhelainen said the killer’s DNA on a shawl was from the Polish-Jewish barber Aaron Kosminski."The shawl has been openly handled by loads of people and been touched, breathed on, spat upon," Richard Cobb, who runs Jack the Ripper conventions and tours, told The Times of London. "My DNA is probably on there. What’s more, Kosminski is likely to have frequented prostitutes in the East End of London. If I examined that shawl, I’d probably find links to 150 other men from the area." ("DNA testing reportedly reveals identity of Jack the Ripper," FoxNews, September 08, 2014) Dr. Addison Davis Hard wrote that the first human donor insemination was performed in 1884, by the Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia. “According to Hard, the mother, a patient of Dr. William Pancoast, was the Quaker wife of a local merchant, fifteen years her senior.” Dr. Pancoast performed the donor experiment without informing either the woman or her husband of his intentions. “As a result of this medical school experiment, the merchant’s wife gave birth to a son, who became the first known child by donor insemination (DI).” But who was the mysterious paternal donor? “The idea of applying artificial insemination to human propagation was difficult enough for turn-of-the-century society to accept: to use the sperm of a man other than the woman’s husband was scandalous. Hard’s letter triggered heated debate among lawyers, moralists, theologians and medical practitioners.” “The first commission produced a report strongly critical of DI, and recommended that the practice be made a criminal offense. A Parliamentary Commission agreed. In Italy, the Pope declared DI a sin, and proposed that anyone using the procedure be sent to prison.” (“Sperm Banking History,” California Cryobank, 1977-2012) The fate of a Quaker son passing a requisite time to grow up and meet his biological father is interesting. Perhaps the “Horus Incarnation” was the invention of a social philosophy advocating the improvement of human genetic traits. Maybe unseen corporate benefactors watched his every move, waiting for his “coming of age.” When the boy would become 13 years old and accountable for his actions he would be told the truth of his asexual origin — even if his “creation” were an illicit offense according to commission rulings, and a sin of eugenics as stated by the Vatican. Sperm is produced at puberty, which can be as early as 10 and late as 15. As said by the Cleveland Street boys’ brothel conversation, Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence and Avondale, known as “Prince Eddy,” was a possible sperm donor — when he was barely eleven years old. (Pedophiliac details remained confidential throughout the Victorian era.) Although hordes of prostitutes ran the streets of London, sex was a subject that was not discussed openly and honestly. Prince Albert Victor Christian Edward (Duke of Clarence and Avondale, grandson of Queen Victoria), known as “Eddy,” had hearing problems and became withdrawn from people. “Eddy’s life was virtually ignored by historians until the 1970s, when myths began to accumulate and his character somehow grew horns and a tail.” (Andrew Cook, “Prince Eddy: The King Britain Never Had,” 2009) “Eddy’s private life also made him the subject of scandal. In 1889, the London police uncovered a male brothel on Cleveland Street. In a time when homosexual acts were outlawed, the raid made headlines as a number of men in British high society were implicated in the scandal. During this time arose the rumor that a member of the British royal family had frequented the Cleveland Street brothel, and the name that came forward was Eddy’s. Though none of the male prostitutes in the brothel had ever named Eddy as a client, there was a great deal of talk that seemed to suggest his frequent presence there. Eventually, the Prince of Wales intervened and Eddy was never officially prosecuted or questioned in the investigation, but this forever tainted his image with later biographers.” (“The Curious Case of Prince Eddy,” About Royalty, March 22, 2010) CONTINUE READING: ufodigest.com/article/jack-the-ripper-0908
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Sept 10, 2014 14:22:48 GMT -6
ufodigest.com/article/jack-the-ripper-0909JACK THE RIPPER DNA HOAX? - PART 2 By Peter Fotis Kapnistos September 9, 2014 “Kelly had been a coworker of Annie’s, as well as a model for Sickert, and she became the child’s nanny soon after its birth. Knowing that the game was up, Kelly hid Alice with nuns and fled into the East End. Eventually, she told the story to several of her cronies (Nichols, Stride and Chapman) and they decided to blackmail the government when they needed money to pay local protection thugs. When Salisbury learned of the threat, he called on Gull again. If you missed Part I of this series click here! ufodigest.com/article/jack-the-ripper-0908“This time, Gull devised an elaborate scheme to silence the women based on Masonic rituals. Enlisting the help of John Netley, a coachman, he created Jack the Ripper as a symbol of Freemasonry. Sir Robert Anderson was enlisted to help cover up the crimes and act as lookout during the murders. The murders would be silent messages about the power and strength of Masonry and the fate awaiting any who opposed them.” (casebook.org) Prince Eddy was said to stop at the Cleveland Street sauna baths. Yet there was another “Little Eddie” in the same murky dwelling. He was one of the messenger boys or liveried squires that filled the baths and laundered the towels according to “Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution” (1976) by Stephen Knight. When the violent rumors began, he switched his name and slipped through the police dragnets. Edward Alexander Crowley changed his name to “Aleister” by the age of 14 years old. (“Edward did not seem to suit me and the diminutives Ted or Ned were even less appropriate.”) But Edward didn’t conceal his handwriting very much: CONTINUE READING: ufodigest.com/article/jack-the-ripper-0909
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Oct 22, 2014 10:48:50 GMT -6
www.aol.com/article/2014/10/22/jack-the-ripper-study-based-on-error/20982356/?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl38|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D550142Jack the Ripper study based on error / VIDEOOct 22nd 2014 Scientists claim the recent bombshell study revealing the identity of Jack the Ripper was all based on an error. The study in question, led by amatuer sleuth Russel Edwards, was centered around a blood-stained shawl found near one of the ripper's victims. Edwards and genetic expert Dr. Jari Louhelainen used mitochondrial DNA to link the shawl to prostitute Catherine Eddowes and polish immigrant Aaron Kosminski. They claim an extremely rare DNA alteration conclusively matched Kosminski to the infamous serial killer. However, now a group of DNA experts are poking a giant hole in the discovery. The new team of researchers claim Edwards referenced the wrong mutation, and the correct alteration isn't rare at all. In fact, it's extremely common. Meaning, the match isn't significant. One of the new researchers wrote,"The same match would have been seen with almost anyone who had handled the shawl over the years." The publisher of Edwards book, "Naming Jack the Ripper," is investigating the error but points out there is still more evidence proving Kosminski is the killer. This isn't the first study to use DNA evidence to try to prove a long-time Ripper suspect was guilty of the crimes. For Patricia Cornwell's 2002 book "Portrait of a Killer," she had a stamp from a Jack the Ripper letter analyzed for DNA and found it matched artist Walter Sickert, who she claims painted works depicting Ripper crimes that only the killer and detectives would have been privy to. Her book was met with harsh criticism, just like Edwards. CONTINUE READING & WATCH VIDEO: www.aol.com/article/2014/10/22/jack-the-ripper-study-based-on-error/20982356/?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl38|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D550142
|
|
|
Post by skywalker on Oct 22, 2014 11:18:35 GMT -6
If all these critics spent half as much time trying to find out who Jack the Ripper was as they do criticizing everybody else who is trying to the mystery would have been solved decades ago.
|
|
BLACK DOG
New Member
Survived Stage 4 Lung Cancer so far.
Posts: 79
|
Post by BLACK DOG on Nov 1, 2014 14:01:32 GMT -6
Lost of speculation on "evidence", real or created. I think no one knows for sure except such a kill did exist but beyond that, to me, lots of guessing.
|
|
|
Post by skywalker on Nov 1, 2014 20:40:46 GMT -6
Some people don't like to give up their unsolved mysteries. It's just no fun if it's not mysterious anymore. Kind of like those big heads on Easter Island. Archaeologists know just about everything there is to know about those silly looking heads including who built them, how they were built, where they were built, why they were built and how they were moved yet every time there is a show about unsolved mysteries they always show those Easter Island heads with some deep voiced announcer saying, "Who built these mysterious heads? How were they carved? How were they moved over such vast distances? Did aliens do it?" The Jack the Ripper evidence looked pretty convincing to me but since there are people who are continuing to refute it I guess I will give them the benefit of the doubt and continue to have an open mind about it. I suppose it's possible the evidence could have been wrong. For all I know Jack the Ripper might have been one of the same aliens who are now doing all of the cattle mutilations. They just wanted to practice on some less important species like humans before they started on the cows.
|
|
|
Post by auntym on Nov 1, 2014 21:30:20 GMT -6
i always thought it was one of the royal family... consider me biased---i'm irish...
|
|