Post by watusimba on Jan 15, 2016 18:17:54 GMT -6
In the annals of Bigfoot research, think about this. Of the many tens of thousands of Bigfoot footprints that have been seen, casted, photographed, if only one of them is real, than there has got to be a living creature that made it. You can't have it any other way. If a print is real, than there has got to be a Bigfoot.
Now, besides the fact that Bigfoot prints have been found in a variety of places, with some being found in such remote places that it doesn't make sense for a hoaxer to be there, perhaps the most incredible set of prints were the Bossburg Cripple. This was a broken and crippled print that even an anatomist would have been hard pressed to create, and therefore, on that basis alone, it would be unreasonable and impossible to fake.
Better still, I believe that the first, ever, recorded footprint was found by a trapper/trader named David Thompson. That was back in 1811, folks, and for centuries before that, Native Americans were seeing footprints. The prints Thompson found It were 14 inches long, while he
and some companions were crossing the Rocky Mountains near Jasper, Alberta Canada. That was where they located a line of prints in the snow. Thompson actually
made a journal entry about the tracks and specifically stated that
they were not made by a bear.
The reason I point this out is this. Say what you will about hoaxs, fake footprints, what have you. Back in 1811, absolutely nobody was going to fake footprints in the Rockies, out in the middle of no where, where the chances of finding them were virtually nil. If there ever was a question about the reality of a footprint, the ones reported in 1811 would not have been faked. The same could be said about the Bossburg Cripple tracks as well. And as I said, just one footprint that is real, means there is a real animal that made it. And if a real animal makes it, then we have undeniable proof that there is a unknown hominid walking around in North America. And so it goes.
Now, besides the fact that Bigfoot prints have been found in a variety of places, with some being found in such remote places that it doesn't make sense for a hoaxer to be there, perhaps the most incredible set of prints were the Bossburg Cripple. This was a broken and crippled print that even an anatomist would have been hard pressed to create, and therefore, on that basis alone, it would be unreasonable and impossible to fake.
Better still, I believe that the first, ever, recorded footprint was found by a trapper/trader named David Thompson. That was back in 1811, folks, and for centuries before that, Native Americans were seeing footprints. The prints Thompson found It were 14 inches long, while he
and some companions were crossing the Rocky Mountains near Jasper, Alberta Canada. That was where they located a line of prints in the snow. Thompson actually
made a journal entry about the tracks and specifically stated that
they were not made by a bear.
The reason I point this out is this. Say what you will about hoaxs, fake footprints, what have you. Back in 1811, absolutely nobody was going to fake footprints in the Rockies, out in the middle of no where, where the chances of finding them were virtually nil. If there ever was a question about the reality of a footprint, the ones reported in 1811 would not have been faked. The same could be said about the Bossburg Cripple tracks as well. And as I said, just one footprint that is real, means there is a real animal that made it. And if a real animal makes it, then we have undeniable proof that there is a unknown hominid walking around in North America. And so it goes.