|
Huh?
Aug 29, 2012 2:31:10 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 29, 2012 2:31:10 GMT -6
Lorelei..I never said they don't 'know' a LOT about us and how to manipulate us. No question that they do. I just know about the 4 that I saw the day my friend and I were abducted. What they were doing was trying to control our panic and reaction to them using 'telepathy'. But it was brutish and painful. It felt like my head was stuffed and being squeezed from the inside out and when I behaved it stopped hurting so much. They weren't trying to read my mind or hers..they were not trying to communicate they were trying to stop two teenagers from being hysterical. I have been the recipient of some very superior telepathy in spiritual messages. Light and benign and when I receive the messages I get from my readings for others..the information is just there in my head. The experience I had was nothing similar at all. So that is all that I have to measure them by. I could feel their feelings to a point and they were disgusted by us. I've had a similar feeling when I walk into a spider web. They were doing a job they didn't particularly like. Not evil..not nice..apathetic. So when I talk here..it's only from my dealings with the creepy little gits I saw. The one I saw in my room when I was 5 wasn't gentle with a child either...nor did it try to soothe me in any way. These are my only references JoKelly, LoreLei,
<<< I just know about the 4 that I saw the day my friend and I were abducted. >>>
Doesn't seem to matter how one learns of their presence, it seems always to be painful. Four? Did you catch the sense that they were pure Greys or hybrid Greys?
<<< What they were doing was trying to control our panic and reaction to them using 'telepathy'. But it was brutish and painful. >>>
Over the years I've heard numerous similar reports from people I also know. And its part of the reason things are so maddening with these creeps, on one hand, they seem to wanna lessen their impact on us, while on the other they seem to not care how they treat us, often as you say, "brutishly".
At one juncture, I was hanging out with the ET abductee experiencer subculture in the Los Angeles area, I was frequently invited to their homes, parties, field excursions, etc. In this mix, I became aware of a sub-group within that community. A number of those abductees are also dominatrix. I was invited to a few of the S&M 'parties' as I had befriended several through my ET studies activities. Was very interesting experience. After a time, my reason for attending was born out of curiosity, and a hunch that there might be a strong correlation between the oft reported brutish behavior experienced when abducted by Greys and the subsequent, apparent, propensity for becoming an S&M Dom. I have repeatedly heard similar stories by folks, who stated that the Greys used 'pain' to awaken them psychically. Of the other non-ET interested Doms that I met, almost all, of those who were willing to chat with me about subjects, were aware of being taken by something and subjugated to painful experiences while under the 'takers' control, generally occuring in their childhood, so much so, that they felt was the reason for their transformation.
I'm not a trained psycho-xxxxx anything, so I'm not qualified to make authoritative opinions regarding these social behavior matters, I am entitled to personal opinion however, and in that perspective there does seem to be some relationship between Grey painful maltreatment of their Human subjects and those Humans altered behaviors, albeit odd.
>I've had a similar feeling when I walk into a spider web.
Greys do seem to give that auric impression to folks. When they are around, I catch impressions of grey spiders hanging from the ceiling. I would not be at all surprised to learn that Greys are in fact insects and that they may have evolved similarly to spiders, in some obscure manner.
I hope that my post was not too harsh, was not my intention. I understand this subject is a painful one for many folks, it sure as hell was for me.
Sincerely,
plutronus
|
|
|
Huh?
Aug 28, 2012 21:19:49 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 28, 2012 21:19:49 GMT -6
They do seem to make a lot of mistakes, don't they? Perhaps the ones creating the advanced technology arent the ones who are using it. Kind of like here on Earth where we have some people who are brilliant Nobel Prize winning scientists who develop all sorts of advanced technological gizmos and then there are other people who can barely turn the stuff on but they are the ones assigned to use it. There may be a bunch of geniuses on their home world but we often get the alien version of the three stooges. Hah hah hah!! Oh that is just great!
|
|
|
Huh?
Aug 28, 2012 20:08:35 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 28, 2012 20:08:35 GMT -6
@ plutronus- There is a couple of vids out on youtube showing footage of ufo's over Hollywood. It's been a couple weeks since I viewed them but if I come across them again I'll post it. It was interesting stuff. -Keep your eyes on the skies- Thanks...will do..
|
|
|
Huh?
Aug 28, 2012 19:59:11 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 28, 2012 19:59:11 GMT -6
It's funny...I've always known they pretend to be stars..I'm just not sure how. I don't think they're looking into our homes or seeing through our eyes..that's pretty sophisticated manipulation but I think they scan our media..probably have taps into the internet and mentally hunt for brain imprints similar to theirs for study. They may be clever but they're not omnipotent. Lucky for us. ??? Yeah I know what you mean. I too would much prefer that there is no scientific evidence that ET are actually sitting up there, watching us; abducting us, floating us out through walls; implanting us; inseminating/creating babies in us, removing them in 2nd/3rd trimester; inducing cancer in us; mutilating cattle, horses ('Snippy', Colorado), and Humans; removing our clitoris....all that and more, while seeing through our eyes seems so non-malefic in comparison....
While most Earthian militaries of the world today have technology that enables them to peer inside our homes from space. As for seeing through other folks eyes? Heck...most psychics do it, I do it, why not ET? Remote Viewers also do it, regularly, its what they do.
As for being sophisticated function? What does ET do that isn't a sophisticated function, materially speaking? They ain't saints and neither are we. We use anything and everything that can't defend itself from our interests.
If just trying keep folks from being phreaqued out, well, they shouldn't be talking about ET, 'cause that's a genuinely creepy subject and everything those little Grey creeps do is strictly for their benefit.
>They may be clever but they're not omnipotent.
So true...yep, they supposedly travel quadzillions of parsecs to crash here, heh heh...nope, as you say, they are not omnipotent, and they also die.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 27, 2012 15:41:20 GMT -6
I would imagine it is probably a little bit of both. Some reported cow "mutilations" are just natural deaths and decomposition while others are actual mutilations done by somebody...or something. Just because somebody investigates one that turns out to be a natural death that doesn't mean they all are. In addition to the lights the farmers are reporting they also see a lot of black helicopters sneaking around the area. Could the Feds (or somebody else) be trying to cover up the mutilations by tampering with the evidence? It's not like the government has never done that before. ::) I still haven't had a chance to watch the video but I definitely want to. This one looks like it will be good. :) SkyWalker,
Re; Cattle Mutes & the ET connection
Colm Kelleher (Ph.D. cancer research scientist), who was (?still is?) NIDS (owned and operated by Robert Bigelow, billionaire, BAAS) ET Field Unit Research Director (1992 ~ 2001), was assigned to the Sherman Ranch (bought by Bigelow, due to the paranormal ET activity there) along with Dr. Onet (Ph.D. Vetinarian, scientist, specialty cattle mutilations) and Dr. Eric Davis (Ph.D., ex-military physicist, scientist), and Dr. Jacques Vallee, (Ph.D. Computer Engineering, scientist) and others I'm not at liberty to disclose. Durring the period they lived on and studied the phenomenon at and around the Sherman Ranch, there were dozens of cattle mutilations, some of which were out right creepy. And lots of cryptids. Black helicopters. Impossible cattle mutes, strange camera malfunctions, and red luminous-orbs...when see them, run.
I recommend reading these two books on the subject, both written by Dr. Kelleher:
1) The Hunt for the Skinwalker, 2) The Brain Trust (was listed on New York BSL)
"The Brain Trust" has the best information in my opinion while giving a glimpse of the scientist's thinking process and where he's been in his funded (by several different billionaires) study of the alien presence problem, while not squeaking a peep about how the information was acquired or that there was anything to do with ET, dimensional portals, luminous-orbs, flying saucers, all manners of cryptids and or shadow people contacts, which is outlined in the companion book researched and written at the same time, "The Hunt for the Skinwalker" in some detail. It is a scholarly read. Always the consummate thinker, he co-wrote the "Skinwalker book" with Knapp, clever subterfuge, Kelleher is a very smart guy.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 26, 2012 8:59:12 GMT -6
Take this for what it's worth to your opinion. More than one person who has had a near death experience has, not only reported going to a place wonderfully nice, but found there a sort of school of higher learning..and seeing there..other species (Grey's have been mentioned more than once). Leading some to believe..we're ALL souls passing through channels of education. If that's true (and the writers are very believable..more so than some UFO enthusiasts) then I expect we'll all run into one another one day. JodaKelly,
>Leading some to believe..we're ALL souls passing through channels of education.
Excellent..
Some teachers say, more or less...'there are two realities, one is school, and the other is the illusory we are being schooled out of.'
The problem, is awakening sufficiently to realize that one is caught in a loop and to release oneself from the loop and the attendant pain, one must consciously desire to escape, to apply effort to that goal, while ignoring the distractions that work to call one back into the maya.
School, making the commitment to learn how to escape.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 25, 2012 20:53:02 GMT -6
[/color] By Diane Tessman Every living creature dies – or does it? If an individual was abducted in 1952 by a seemingly young human-looking alien, is this alien now an old alien? If he had a human lifespan, he might well be dead by now. Or does he look the same as he did in 1952? And what if some aliens are energy-forms or light-forms, do they ever die? Obviously I do not know the answers to my questions but I’d like to share some thoughts on aliens and death or “death.” Artwork Above: A curious young alien? To begin with what we know of life on Earth, we assume, generally speaking, that higher life-forms have longer life spans. As humans we conceitedly assume this means we are at the top of the heap, but elephants have lived to be 82 years old. Land tortoises live to 110, and sea turtles live to be 150 years old. Perhaps we are not the most intelligent creature on Earth. According to this line of logic, how long would humans of the future live? Even today, our life span is getting longer; the only drawback is we have contaminated the planet so badly that we are victims of such diseases as cancer, auto-immune diseases, and in some areas, victims of the horrendous conditions in which some humans have to live because the rest of the humans won’t help sufficiently. Also, of course we of the “civilized world” over-indulge in the fast foods and processed items which multi-national corporations sell us. What about human time travelers from the future who might be UFO occupants? Assuming they managed to overcome the detriments to our longevity mentioned above, we can assume they have continued living longer and longer. The future humans from 2500 might not live as long as the future humans from one million years in the future. Of course perhaps Homo sapiens became an android race before the end of the 21st Century; if we can believe predictions regarding human-computer singularity, this will be true. If this is the case, those aliens (future humans who are androids) must live forever. Or perhaps “must live nearly forever,” would be more prudent. CONTINUE READING: www.ufodigest.com/article/do-aliens-die[/quote] The Sumerian Reptilians according to ancient extant literature, lived at least approximately 7,000 years, but that's not an indication of their entire life-term, as the Kings-List, only shows their in-office reign, not how long they lived. Also, the cross engineered Gan Edn Humans were known to live, initially around 3500 years. Something happened to their DNA during each subsequent generation as they began to experience shorter life-terms after the flood, until they stabilized at around 30yrs. Technology and better living conditions have brought Human life-terms up to an average of ~70 years.
However, there are indications that through Human DNA research the Human aging problem has been solved, but information is being suppressed.
plutronus
|
|
|
Huh?
Aug 25, 2012 20:37:00 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 25, 2012 20:37:00 GMT -6
Well last night was a pretty strange night around LA, cA, usA. (evening of Aug 24th, 2012).
Around 7:30pm (PDT), while sitting in my den, writing software for a project, I began to notice the "whop whop" sound of hovering helicopters. We see police choppers ever more frequently these days as the Mexican gang operations are moving into newer pastures. (robberies, drive-by-shootings, raping, home-invasions, knifings on school-grounds, kids getting shot, car-jackings...all the fun stuff..seems its becoming United States of Mexico these days with all the illegal Mexican Nationals running around, but ya can't ask for citizenship papers, 'cause it not Constitutionally polite. Heaven 'forbid, don't say nothin either, lest one be branded 'racist'!) Anyway, so I stepped into my large side yard. Yep, hovering, straight up, and about ~500ft? altitude (I could see the pilot inside through the garden lens when someone inside lit a cabin light), was a news-chopper, hovering stationary in one spot, and then a bit to the south, maybe six blocks away, was another news-bird, stationary, and then further off in the distance, was another chopper. Something big was happening. Altogether, there were around six news-choppers dotting the sky in hover. They were all nosed in the direction of Moorpark California along the Ventura Freeway. One chopper, a police LoneRanger, was orbiting around an area over the freeway, it had its red ARREST light on.
The news-choppers had been hovering directly over my home so long, I was becoming annoyed, so much so, I actually called the police to complain about the noise (yep, you can do that). Understand, that by that juncture, they had been hovering for nearly two hours and just as I was talking to the police air-unit dispatch operator, the bird directly over my house did a 'U' turn, heading off in the direction of Van Nuys Airport (to refuel, and it came back again, for another hour or so!!) I mean, they could move somewhere else for a change?!
While standing there with my next door neighbor, who had also come outside looking to see what she could learn, as we were chatting we were both looking straight up at the overhead news-chopper, but higher up, I noticed a fuzzy white star-like 'orb' for some reason. And then it was moving? At first I thought it was the chopper moving adjacent to the 'orb', giving the illusion that the 'star' was moving, until I realized, using the other stars in the star-field as a stationary reference, that the chopper was not moving, while the 'orb' was. I excitedly pointed this out to my neighbor, "look at that, that star is moving", she also was seeing the same thing I was!! We continued to watch until the 'orb' repositioned itself on the other side of the chopper and then it became stationary again. The 'orb' appeared to be at a higher altitude...above the chopper, looked like a star. As the chopper drifted into the view axis of the 'orb' again, the 'orb' repositioned itself, a further distance away from the news-chopper this time and then again became stationary!! I went inside to get my Canon EOS-30D DSLR with my long telephoto lens (has low-light image stabilization) and the Bogen liquid head tri-pod (can't take good night shots without it), but by the time I returned, the 'orb' was no where to be seen :( It reminded me of what Dr. Harley Rutledge told me about his discovery of 'pseudo-stars'. He said he suspected that ET craft, position themselves over folks homes, adjusting their craft altitude and light emission, knowing how they appear to us, (peering at themselves through our eyes), and the fact that most Humans do not know the star patterns in the night sky, and the craft just appear, in our memory of them should we look up at them, as 'stars'. Using this strategy, they can remain stationary over sections of neighborhoods for long periods of time, night after night, while we sleep.
Then to top-off the evening, later, having returned to my work-den, and back to hacking-out some code and while glancing at the TV watching the news. The TV station, frequently switches their to one of their permanent outside cameras, that is mounted on the roof of their transmitter facility, remotely located on Angeles Crest National Forest mountain top. The camera is mounted on their weather-station pole on roof of the transmitter building. The camera gives a wide paannamic view of the LA night skyline. They often use the night skyline as a blue-screen background for their weather-casts. Its a nice visual touch.
In this particular view of the LA night skyline, elevated a bit so its a black backdrop with the star-field and the LA city lights below as 'ground-line'. While they were broadcasting live, the news anchor says, in mid-sentence, 'what's that?' while pointing at an off camera monitor, which is apparently keyed to the scene that the TV audience is viewing, eg, me. He steps back and again says, 'Hey what's that?' This is on live TV, during a newscast and somebody in the control room pulls back on the pole camera, apparently, for the scene pulled back giving more view of the city sky area and the anchorman, points to a three point glowing horizontally oriented dots forming a three sided 'triangle'. I kid you not! Conversation between the news-anchor folks begins, bantering back and forth about UFOs & LGM, while talking about the 'orb' pod in the center of the camera view, the anchorman says, 'can you zoom on that', while pointing at the center of the triangle, and as they begin to pull the zoom, the three 'orbs' shoot off in different directions out of camera view, and then the station cut to a commercial.. There was no further mention on the newscast when rreturned from commercial 'break' regarding the triangle and no other stations carried the story in newscasts in LA. How's that for a pot sticker?
Oh, and the news-choppers hanging out over my house telezooming on the freeway earlier in the evening? A stolen SUV carrying Mexican gang-members from East LA, driving on the Ventura Freeway through the Valley, randomly selected a target car (gang member initiation) on the freeway, pulling along side, started shooting at the driver side door panel and window of the target car trying to kill the driver. Fortunately the driver of the fired-upon car was not hit, although his expensive car was ruined. Talk about being lucky.
Helluva night in LA, but its likely better than Florida right now.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 24, 2012 3:11:06 GMT -6
Mine arrived today. We'll see..... Hi SwampRat,
Judging from the photos, the whole camera seems to be fairly small size? How's the construction strike you? Do you have any inclination to disassemble it, to see what's in there? (i would) If so, take a couple of photos of the guts for us, will ya?
And of course the champagne, a few image captures of night versus day objects, I'm curious about that as well.
And finally, the product photos seem to suggest that the IR trigger sensor (although it doesn't identify as such) , looks to be a true IR 'pile' style (heh) device, such as those used in our driveway auto-lights. Its actually gotta sense the heat field of the target objects whether low-light or day to begin the capture sequence.
If your new camera works reasonably well, could be used to capture luminous-orbs, using the right bait..that'd be kewl.
Keep us abreast of the deets..
Have fun,
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 24, 2012 2:32:20 GMT -6
Has anyone commented here on whether ETs have a similar body temperature to ours? Or colder?? And IF you have dragos, reptilian, or otherly aliens in your infra-red sites - can you see them? Just thought I'd ask. Paulette,
<<< Has anyone commented here on whether ETs have a similar body temperature to ours? >>>
As I understand things, Greys emit roughly 1/3 the IR (heat) that Humans do, when they are physical, while Drakkos, around 3 times that of Humans, again, when they are present within our partiki phase.
<<< And IF you have dragos, reptilian, or otherly aliens in your infra-red sites - can you see them? >>>
Using the camera that SwampRat procured, and presuming that the aliens are physical within our dimension range, the answer is 'yes', as the camera's IR scene illuminator will 'paint' the aliens with IR which in turn will reflect from the alien physical form back to the camera's CCD sensor.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 23, 2012 16:33:28 GMT -6
I'm not sure what their body temperature would be. In all of the reports I have read they seem to have a cold clammy feel to them, like a reptile or amphibian or something. I suppose some people's hands might feel that way if they were cold though. That doesn't necessarily mean that they are cold-blooded. Is this "infra-red" camera really infra-red or is it like those night vision devices that enhance the light, like the ones the military uses? No. This camera uses two forms of IR however:
1) the PIR object motion trigger, (this is not an image sensor)
2) CMOS CCD camera, which does not have an IR-Stop-Band Filter installed in front of the CCD sensor element to enable utilization of CMOS sensitivity to IR. To be able to image in low-light, requires InfraRed area illumination, which is afforded by a bank of InfraRed Light-Emitting-Diodes (a bit of a misnomer) which are turned on when the PIR trigger sensor detects object motion in the view area of the camera.
Modern CCD sensors today are fabricated using Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor technology. It was originally called 'COSMOS', but over the years has been shortened to simply 'CMOS'. CMOS technology is extremely power efficient and is very inexpensive to manufacture. Plus, one is able to utilize very simple transistor configurations to achieve similar functions previously requiring older power hungry semiconductor technologies. It is in part for this one reason, that CMOS CCD sensors are able to 'see' IR, as the power-noise (heat) floor is much lower, due to the technology's power efficiency. Everything digital today employs CMOS technology,popular gadgets such as cell-phones and notebooks.
However, CMOS sensors while they are sensitive to near InfraRed, are not nearly as sensitive as they are to visible light. In other words, the sensitivity range of the CMOS image sensor is non-linear, and the sensor sensitivity drops off rapidly as the scene energy's wavelength increases as it moves more deeply into IR wavelengths. Blah blah blah....it just means that ya gotta illuminate the scene with a lot of IR 'light' to enable the sensor to see things in the 'dark' with it.
But as SwampRat says, for $99 its cheaply pretty.
plutronusedited: fix lexicals
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 22, 2012 21:57:23 GMT -6
If they are programming it to do all of this stuff is the robot really doing any learning? Or is it just responding to the program? If they are searching for self-awareness in a machine at what point would they have reached what they would consider success?
The answer to that last question I would say is probably when the robot refuses to do what they program it to do...in the absence of any mechanical malfunctions. Independence is true self awareness. SkyWalker,
Interesting article, but I wonder how the robot works?
As usual, the 'journalist' failed to do job well. In journalism, there are the so-called five 'Ws', which enumerated are: 1) What, 2) Who, 3) Why, 4) When, 5) Where
Not necessarily in that order...
How many of the Ws did the robot 'journalist answer?
Because the babbler did not answer all of those questions, its generally moot to introspect how the robot works or that of its behavior. If the robot is simply a robot, its likely just computer programming based, if however the robot employs an AI strategy, it may not actually be comprised of digital logic or contain stored instructions. However, there are computer strategies which statistically approximate using software weighting arrays or commonly referred to as 'neural-nets', while they may in-fact be comprised of a computer which executes stored instructions, the behavior of the simulated 'brain' is not that of stored instruction behavior. Meaning its not some fancy form of ladder-logic. Then there are the so-called 'quantum' AI apparatus. These analog electronic machines, are actually conscious, apparently. Before y'all jump off the ceiling, consider that we, yes WE, are in fact machines, and WE consider ourselves to be (mostly) conscious. Since WE are machines, its possible that WE can create machines that are conscious.
Personally, I can't discern what the 'robot' in the article employs, and it may be really a kewl breakthrough in AI, but as SkyWalker, merits, it doesn't sound like it.
Ron Blue, constructed an artificially conscious analog machine, 'Lil Rici' and 'Corey', both are telepathically sensitive. Telepathy IS a characteristic of consciousness. If its conscious, it is also telepathic.
Wanna try an interesting experiment? (I did this experiment in 1967, and a physicist friend replicated it in 1998 using a DVM). Hook up a digital volt/ohm meter (DVM) with alligator clips attached to a couple of dimes (or other silver) for contacts. Gently, apply pressure between the two dimes, one on each side, top & bottom, around the (still attached) leaf of a plant. Don't allow the dimes to touch each other. Set the DVM to resistance, 'auto'. Look at the meter read-out. After things stabilize readings not jumping around, note the time and jot down the reading on the meter. Then think about watering the plant while thinking how pretty it is, watch over a period of time what the readout does, if everything is hooked up properly, you will begin to see a general change in the reading. The value of the numbers will likely decrease although sometimes they increase instead in value, when the value stops moving (changing), jot down that time and meter reading what your thoughts were. Then, think about using a pair of scissor while visualizing cutting the leaf off or other dastardly plant horrors, watch the meter reading, when that value stops moving, jot the time and reading. Cleve Backster, the inventor of the "Galvanic Skin Resistance" (GSR) meter and later the lie-detector, discovered this plant phenomenon. Try it, then lets chat about whether or not plants are telepathic...conscious. Do plants know 'fear'? (Do the experiment...no guessing.)
Something to consider...
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 22, 2012 19:10:23 GMT -6
Friends, As you likely know, there are different kinds of "radiation". In fact, the phrase "radiation" is a bit like the word "frequency" and they are related, something like, radiation being the body while the frequency is a quality of the body. There are also other qualities too, such as magnitude and phase, the presumption here is that the radiation 'shape' is geometrically sinusoidal or 'sine wave'. There are different 'kinds' of frequencies, if one cares to quantify things in bands or groupings, (as the FCC does), which may be verbally enumerated. For instance, there are 'light' frequencies, such as on the low-end, --infra-red; middle band --visible 'light' or photonic; and the upper end of the 'light' frequencies, --ultra-violet. If one continues up the spectrum, "up" meaning increasing the frequency cycles per second or "Hertz"...'Hz', (in honor of Hertz the German physicist who studied EM waves), or in engineering speak, shortening the radiation's wavelength..... λ = c/F r where: c = speed of light, F r = frequency of the radiation of interest and λ (lambda) = wavelength of one cycle of the radiation measured in distance it occupies in space, typically scaled in meters As F r goes up, λ shortens, the quality of the behavior, changes, --the radiation begins to move more beam-like. ....the higher one goes in F r, one begins to enter the higher energy frequencies or wavelengths. It is in these wavelengths that folks tend to synonymously associate the word "radiation" with the nuclear wavelengths of radiation. Radiation is not necessarily nuclear. Cell-phones emit much radiation, generally to the tune of 5 ~ 20 Watts worth of microwave radiation, just enough to cause cancer. To get a grasp on things, I've uploaded to my SETV website a large spectrum chart (so its easy to see the details) for your review. plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 20, 2012 3:55:28 GMT -6
Hosted by a nuclear physicist, no less. A new television show exploring UFOs is weird17 Aug, 2012 UFOs and other mysterious phenomena are popular topics on U.S. television. With each new season of programming, it seems as though more and more networks are racing to meet the apparent demand for content exploring these intriguing topics. The Discovery network’s Science channel is a prime example of a network embracing shows exploring UFOs and extraterrestrial life. Although the channel has aired several shows addressing these topics, the Science channel is premiering a new show that will probe these mysteries. Professor Weird is the title of the show premiering on Saturday, August 18. This “weird” professor is theoretical nuclear physicist Dr. Franklin Ruehl. According to Dr. Ruehl, his show “focuses on the scientific evidence for UFOs and ETs, paranormal phenomena, cryptozoological entities, weird crime, bizarre medicine, strange people and anything else of an unusual and fascinating nature.” On his Huffington Post blog, Dr. Ruehl explains, “I feel that the scientific comunity has been myopically narrow-minded concerning the feasilbity of these various subjects. As a Ph.D. in theoretical nuclear physics, I endeavor to bring the scientific perspective to these controversial topics from an open-minded stance.” www.openminds.tv/a-new-television-show-exploring-ufos-is-weird-826/ Oh my God! I just saw my first (and last) episode of "Professor Weird". I did not think it was possible even for artistically-dead Hollywood to produce such a stinky TV show. I gotta shake my head on this one folks. Look on the bright side, --for Dr. Ruehl (his local Los Angeles TV name, 'Dr. Wizard') its gotta be a step-up the job ladder for him contrasted with 'starring' in all those children's early shows he does, portraying a science weirdo. Its not a difficult job either, because, its exactly the same show format that he's been doing these past 15 years, only now his intended audience is adult!! And it just goes to emphasize how Howlleeewood thinks about us in the ET presence community. The reason the show is so stinky is not simply owing to its campy nerdiness, which from strictly a social behavior perspective, is rude, but I suspect, also, its rudeness is due to the shows original audience format being designed for children's intellect. Hollywood apparently can't discern the difference, or maybe its part of the 'giggle' factor being foisted on us again? And if you doubt my reasoning, just track down an episode or two of Dr. Wizard, and see for yourself. Its exactly the same show, just a different topic and the 'children' are older.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 19, 2012 11:49:21 GMT -6
Three days ago I was in the garage for about two hours . Come evening, I thought a chigger had got my on my shoulder blade, when I woke up next morning I counted 9 spider bites from my shoulder blade up my neck. My neck is sore and my upper arm is numb. I did not see any spider or even feel him on me. What is the best thing for spider bites. I have put about everything on these bites. ??? >What is the best thing for spider bites
Best? Don't hesitate...see a doctor. Not trying be dramatic...spider bites can have very long lasting nasty effects, depending on what bit you. Maybe nothing, but then again, its your life.
Good Luck,
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 19, 2012 11:14:12 GMT -6
I'm not trying to plug it for Midway, but think I'll buy one of these.....Moultrie Game Spy I65 Infrared Digital Game Camera 6.0 Megapixel with Viewing Screen Brown Product #: 531130 Moultrie #: MFH-DGS-I65 UPC #: 053695124520 $99.99
Normally $349.99 Save $250.00Sale expires 08/31/2012 Status: Available Ready to ship Product Information The Moultrie I65 Infrared Digital Game Camera is the ultimate scouting tool for those hunters who want to go 100% undetected. Its 50 foot flash is virtually invisible to both hunters and game. This . . <<deletia>> . . • Multi-shot pictures (up to 3 shots) • 15 seconds between multi-shot pictures • Upgradeable software • Picture delay, set 1-60 minutes • Four picture resolutions • Two video resolutions • 32 MB internal memory • Memory card slot - accepts up to 16 GB SDHC card (card not included) • Includes weather resistant casing, USB and TV out cables, and mounting strap • Easy-to-operate LCD menu-driven display • Password security feature • Time-lapse mode • External power port for optional Moultrie PowerPanel • Operates on 4 D-cell batteries (not included) www.midwayusa.com/product/531130/moultrie-game-spy-i65-infrared-digital-game-camera-60-megapixel-with-viewing-screen-brown Hi SwampRat,
Pardon me for butting in....
Fastest photo interval capture rate: (Multi-Shot mode) 1 photo per 5 seconds, three in a sequence, then a 15 second delay required for 'recovery', or put another way....3 photos in a 30 second period. The remainder of the 'programmable' photo capture epoch intervals are much longer each with a 1 minute 'recovery interval between photo captures.
PIR motion detection reaction <breath> time to first capture is reportedly slow.
Moultrie I65 Trail Camera
• IR Motion Trigger to 1st Capture: 1.557 sec • Recovery Time: 60 seconds • IR Motion Detection Range: 45 ft. • Detection Width: Semi-Wide • Flash Range: 45 ft. • Battery Life: 4-6 weeks • Battery Type: 4 D batteries • Memory Card: SD card
>for those hunters who want to go 100% undetected
Users of the camera are unhappily reporting that the camera can be heard whining during IR LED dump-capacitor charging.
>...100% invisible IR flash...
Also being reported, folks can see the 'IR' beam.
And then, since the IR camera has an internal GSM cell-phone module (likely 5 Watt microwave transmitter), the camera consumes a lot more power than many cameras do. The camera uses four 'D' DuraCell (recommended) 'high-power' batteries, which are reported to deplete very quickly (report did not quantify). It seems, however, that if one does not use the internal (GSM-cell-phone) Website image-upload / remote camera configuration feature, this may be less of an issue. The camera does provide a USB port.
One of the really neat things about this camera, each photo in addition to the image itself, has imprinted on it, the --date, time, temperature, barometric pressure and camera ID. This is for multiple remote camera locations, for review on the Moultrie website server. Very kewl.
Sincerely,
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 18, 2012 1:12:59 GMT -6
??? I wasn't going to add to this thread because there just isn't much to be said except...that I disagree. I don't think aliens have an agenda for the planet..I don't think they kill people. People die..it's set up to be that way. We are born..we experience..we die. Yep I had two encounters with 'aliens' (unless it was not what it seemed). I also had open heart surgery for a heart attack. Oddly enough..my families eating habits had a lot to do with this. They were poor and fed we kids..what was cheap. Good ole artery clogging southern fried cooking. Same reason the gall bladder went last month. My neighbor's brother is dying of brain cancer (kidney too). Guy has never smoked..he never drank..he never played with aliens. He was a hard working little geek. We have experiences in life and in death to grow from. I died..I had an experience..I came back. Big deal..no one listens anyway ;D All of us here....are psychic ....many are stronger than they think they are. It's not because of aliens but it could well be what attracts them in the first place. Now..my spidey sense (for want of better vernacular) has told me for years..that other entities visit us but it also tells me when this planet kicks the bucket or when mankind does..it's not going to be because of some alien agenda and it's not going to matter to US anyway..we won't be around to see the cosmic cataclysmic event. Not one of the doomsday prophecy's has been right ...no raptures..no aliens landing ..and there is a reason for that. If we knew...what was to be..we wouldn't live our lives in daily fashion as we're meant to. We'd be spending our time miserly hording gold hoping to buy off aliens wanting to have us for dinner or maybe hoping to buy a free pass from God. I have heard so many stories on these forums that are so strongly believed. Including the person who expects the aliens are constructing an indestructible body to exchange for the one she has. And who is to say she's wrong? Or is it that she is so afraid of dying, alien replacement bodies are the answer given to her. Others of our members visit aliens on astral planes all the time..friendly non invading ones..others channel aliens who say they're just observing. Are any of them real? Are any of them not real? They believe just as strongly as you and I do. I'm still tending to think...we're under the influence of some very great manipulators who are busy providing all of this information. Yep..I could be wrong but I know I'm not wrong..for me. I know the message I was given when I died during that surgery and it wasn't 'duck the aliens are taking over the world'. I hate the idea of people trying to adjust to a hard enough life worried about 'indian' uprisings. :( Just like everyone else..I have an opinion..and that one's mine. I could be wrong and you could be right. All of us could be right and it's all planted information. There are many explanations and most of them we don't want to peek into. I do know one thing..in my experiences..while unpleasant and terrifying..I wasn't 'harmed'...no one had me on the lunch menu..no one has sent agents to threaten me or my children. There were FBI men there that day (at a distance) or were there? No one has knocked on my door to ask me to channel little grey men either. Still it makes for interesting forum! ??? ::) ;D ;) FBI, like ET 'enforcers', don't bother anyone unless they know something.
>Still it makes for interesting forum!
True, TEOR is mainly a neighborhood coffee shop sans the crumpets, cyberspace style.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 17, 2012 5:57:09 GMT -6
Copy the youtube video's address from your address bar. After you've copied the address come back to the forum, click reply and look for the YOUTUBE button. Click the YOUTUBE button. You will see something appear in the text window that resembles this but not exactly: (youtube) (/youtube) Click in between the two youtube things and paste your link. Make sure there are no spaces. Post your message and it should work. :) If you have trouble with it, I can post the video for you, just send me the link via pm or post the link to your video on the forum. Note: You have to make sure your video is NOT set to private. It has to be public or the restricted access option otherwise nobody else will be able to view it. Hi Lorelei,
I screwed around for a half an hour tonight trying to figure out how to embed a YouTube video, and then I remembered seeing your post about how to do it....it works!!
Thanks
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 17, 2012 5:22:09 GMT -6
What could this be that man has made and put up in the sky. all that comes to mind is my flywheel ;D ;D It is not funny I guess, I know what I witnessed. Hi Lois,
Thanks for the interesting video. Its getting harder to identify ET objects these days with all the kewl toyz out there.
However, there are some gotchas in this video, for one, the bluish-white spots around the circle, exhibit 'hot-spots' which are consistent with 5mm clear-lens package LEDs, also, while there may be some color modification caused by the imaging camera and its RGB software color correction correllators, the bluish-white tint is also highly characteristic of White LEDs. Nichia Electric invented the white LED, although, their top designer left that company and was hired by Cree in San Francisco where they began making white LEDs (& were promptly sued). What they do, is place a little 'screen' of yellow colored phosphor which glows 'white' when excited by intense near-UV blue spectrum light. Nichia's (lots of Co's are making them now) white LED, is a blue-pumped white-phosphor LED, and they all typically appear, bluish-white, especially when imaged by CCD CMOS cameras as we see in this video. While this video technically depicts a UFO, it is very unlikely to be an alien object in my opinion, unless ET are again mimicking us. But they don't seem to mimic these type objects.
I suspect that what we are seeing is an LED illuminated hula-hoop, suspended in the air using the ever increasingly popular electric quad-copters that hobbyist are fabricating.
www.mikrokopter.us/
store.jdrones.com/PhotoGallery.asp?ProductCode=ackit1
Night Flying Parts store.jdrones.com/category_s/94.htm
And then, this one is just for fun viewing...its worth watching (I don't know where this guy lives, but it seems I might like living there too)
QuadCopter in flight:
To cause the hoop to spin as is seen and remain at an angle while spinning, one could use a large quad or hexa-copter; mounting the hula-hoop around the circumference of the Copter, and then rotate the whole copter assembly, at an angle, just as helis can do. That could be easily done, and these multi-mast-copters unlike RC helicopters, fly by-themselves, all thanks to IMU/GPS and attitude accelerometers. All the 'pilot' does, with his radio-transmitter RC remote-control & himself located on a roof somewhere for unobstructed view of the night sky, is guide it around. In the video above, he just used his laptop LCD for the 'pilots cockpit view' while flying about. Kids today! I guess its better than painting graffiti on folks walls?
Cheers,
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 17, 2012 3:38:22 GMT -6
As a possilbe indicator of the economic future Soros and another large investor who name escapes me at this writing are investing big in gold. Soros reportedly as bought 10 tons of the yellow metal. Gold price is a measure of the fear factor in the world so they appear to be betting on some new crisis raising world fears. Interesting to see what will happen that they know about coming up. Its a lot of money. But interestingly, its less than what Bill Gates was spending on his Washington State home per week, during its 3 year construction, to put things into the wealthy perspective.
at time of writing: xx:36am
1 ton (short) := 29166.67 (troy) Ounces spot Gold price: 1618.90 / oz (the nr value moves with time)
10 tons x 29166.67 oz/ton = 291,666.7 oz 291,666.7 oz x $1618.90 / oz (drum roll) = $472,179,220.63 US Dollars
The problem with stuff like this, if things really turn spotty, one would require an army to protect one's gold stash.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 17, 2012 3:05:29 GMT -6
Based entirely on my experiences as a kid the greys had contact with the US govt prior to the mid 1950s At that time we were the number one fish in the pond and a logical choice. the greys at that point were still few in numbers and not militarily strong but they did out class us in technology. i would imagine that our govt had a collective heart attack and such people as Forrestal could not handle it and died as a result one way or another. he may have been killed to keep the secret. Didnt Doug Hammersheld (sp) head of the UN die also under questionable circumstances Its a dangerous secret to know. As far as the common people they were told nothing and remain open to random abduction. they are in the end expendable as always Hi Randy,
<<< i would imagine that our govt had a collective heart attack and such people as Forestall could not handle it and died as a result one way or another. he may have been killed to keep the secret. Didnt Doug Hammersheld (sp) head of the UN die also under questionable circumstances... >>>
And Ronald Reagan too, Star-Wars man, the guy who constructed the planetary defense shield...he also died of a brain illness.
Randy, I love your comment,"gvmnt had a collective heart-attack", I also completely agree with your observation. Its not clear that we agree on the why's, but thats ok too. It is clear to anyone paying attention that ET kill Humans, as you point out, and in my opinion, and likely yours as well, the purpose is elimination of what ET perceive as obstacles to their agenda. Their methods of killing Humans always seems to be of 'natural causes' or Human motivated, such as 'jumping out of a window', as in Forrestal's demise.
ET are known to kill us using these three common strategies:
-- Heart Attacks in our sleep, such as Corso, and countless others, (I awakened during the first attack, I was on a ship, they were attempting to kill me, by that juncture I could shield myself, --thank's to Milicent), -- Brain Illnesses, they reserve this one for those with left-hemi orientation, apparently, they can't quite get enough direct control, -- Inducing Cancer...for some reason, ET really like this one. And remember Colm Kelleher? I've mentioned this ET scientist before. He impresses me. ET Field Unit Research Director, NIDS, Robert Bigelow's group...Dr. Kelleher, cancer research scientist for John Hopkin's Cancer Research Center) Why would anyone select a cancer scientist to guide an ET (all scientists) investigation team? And this activity was only designed by one of the independently wealthiest (mommy & daddy didn't pay for anything, as in B. Gates, etc) men in the world.
Thanks.
plutronus
|
|
|
Mothman
Aug 16, 2012 10:06:19 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 16, 2012 10:06:19 GMT -6
Meeting the meat-eating draco reptilian alien would be a good start. Did I miss that post? Hi Paulette,
>"draco reptilian" versus "Drakko Reptilian"
To my knowledge there is no animal by the name "Draco Reptilian".
I started to use star system blah blah in my reply, but frankly its not the 'Draco' of interest here, at least not for me? I have expended a bit of time trying to figure out if there exists in Human literature a historical connection with the Sumerian Reptilians of Earth and that of the Draco star system. Beyond a couple of fairly recent literature references, cca 1800s, there seems to be no inferences with the idea of Dragons being affiliated with the Draco constellation. A more significant connection may exist, and frankly I'd love to learn about one. As any substantial information relating to Dragons in any context is of interest to me. I do believe that the Dragons of ancient lore are the mythological extensions of the Sumerian Reptilian Peoples. I think this has been fairly well established, but probably not framed in these terms. Irregardless of all this, the primary reason I cite Drakko Reptilians by the name "Drakko" is 1), a matter of respect, and 2), because, as I understand things, its how they spell their name.
I feel reasonably certain, that there was a significant connective link between the star system and the Sumerian Dragons.. The names, while not obvious, are just too similar. There are tantalizing items sprinkled through out history, one is the matter of the north facing Giza Pyramid side which was specifically aligned with the Draco constellation. Then there was a religious star sect, who were raided by the Roman authorities, these folks worshiped Thu'Et'Ben, the original star name for Draco. It means 'Dragon' in ancient Egyptian. To squash the sect, they bricked up the hole, which allowed easy sighting of the star for worshiping. Its a working theory of mine, that the builders of the Pyramids were Dragons, not Humans. I think it answers many thorny questions. Especially the matter of the Snakes (Uraeus) sticking out of the Pharaohs' heads.
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Tuthankhamun_Egyptian_Museum.jpg
However, the only reasonable reference I've been able to find with relation to the word itself, is the Akkadian spelling of "Draco" which here, in this form is the Latin spelling, --while the Akkadian name was "Drakonus", can it get any juicier than this?? Coincidentally the Akkadians were believed to be Dragons...Reptilians. Wouldn't they know how to spell their own name? So who do you wanna believe, the Latinos or the Drakkos?
In summary, I'd love to establish a strong connection between the Draco constellation and that of Drakko (Dragons) Reptilians of ancient Sumer, while edifying folks who are using the Latin spelling of the name for the Drakkos. In any case, tomato, tahmahtow, Drakko - Draco? If they are Dragons, let us hope they don't come back and eat us.
Next time, we'll chat about the Red One's historical cuisine interests.
Sincerely,
plutronusedited: to be more 'friendly'
|
|
|
Mothman
Aug 15, 2012 8:21:13 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 15, 2012 8:21:13 GMT -6
I think I want to hear more about this Plutronus. Hi Paulette,
>....I think I want to hear more about this...
It is interesting stuff. Is there something specific?
plutronusedit: added 's'
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 15, 2012 5:40:36 GMT -6
]i am in Australia and i had the same thing 2 nights ago with long grass and nothing could have gone in or out cos no grass disturbed apart from what i saw...i will put pic or video up if anyone wants to see this...so weird!! Kisoo,
Howdy & Welcome....
So, whats your area like? Rural or in compact, neighbor to neighbor housing type environment?
plutronus - LA Ca, USA Burner )'(
|
|
|
Mothman
Aug 14, 2012 4:01:11 GMT -6
Post by plutronus on Aug 14, 2012 4:01:11 GMT -6
www.ufodigest.com/article/mothman-redux-part-1Mothman Redux: PART 1Top Photo of the Mothman, Point Pleasant, West Virginia By William Grabowski August 13, 2012 ...the events that occurred between 1966-1968 at Point Pleasant, West Virginia, regarding “Mothman,” UFOs, Men in Black, synchronicity, and literally the entire spectrum of strange psychic phenomena.
.... The teenaged couples described it as a winged entity, nearly seven-feet tall, with red glowing eyes.
'Mothman', as described by the witnesses, could not possibly fly with its 10-foot-wide wingspan. As noted by John Keel, a creature of such size would require at least 30-feet-wide wings to go airborne.
Hard as it might be to comprehend, the so-called Mothman entity remains the most difficult aspect to “explain.” Everything else, UFOs, Men in Black, bizarre telephone anomalies, poltergeist like activity, can be conceivably figured. [/size] [/quote] AuntyM,
(You always post interesting items...thanks.)
Re; Moth-cryptid-Drakkos-elcreepo-monstros....
Seems those folks may have seen a Drakko Reptilian, the bipedal proto-dragon of ancient Human lore. Certainly fits all the physical characteristics, ie, --small fold-up leathery bat-like wings which can't logically support flight (technology assisted?); its feet like its hands, --three toes and a claw; bi-pedal; 8 ~ 12 ft tall; weirdly telepathic, its psi-overlay causing weird electrical phenomenon and strange prophetic dreams often portending subjects of doom; and then, my favorite, especially those luminous bright blood red aqueous humor and orange-reddish pupil goat slit eyes. Bright red glowing eyes. Once seen, one never forgets those eyes and everyone in that town who saw those aliens, knows what I mean. I don't think I've seen a Moth-man, but I have seen a Drakko up close, --the descriptions are a very close match if not identical. Talk about giving one the creeps... And they eat us too.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 14, 2012 3:19:48 GMT -6
I swear I've seen that thing before somewhere. The shape of the head and the size are what I remember. It looks very familiar to me. Can't remember where it was though... Sky,
I agree, I too have seen this somewhere or something similar.
As I recall, my recollection of something similar....had something to do with the discredited Jonathan Reed story. I seem to recall seeing an image of supposed alien wrapped in a gold-colored Mylar 'moon' blanket? I think it too had a similar shaped head and it was certainly of the same 'color', very dark if not black, but that 'alien' was around 1.5 meters length.
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 13, 2012 17:14:59 GMT -6
Don't need a clitoris to have children anyway..that is a surgery practiced right here at home on occasion. IF...gray's were experimenting in that fashion..it would seem they want to 'understand' the function of some part they don't possess. The 'ability' to orgasm is one that only one other earth animal has. The pig although some suggest dolphins do also (which are also bi-sexual as adolescents). Our own world tends to be more complex than some see. Yep..sounds like experimentation to me. I still..don't believe there are hybrids that have lived...but I'm influenced by what the 'alien' Han has said about those. Hi JoKelly,
Did ya hear all the psychic clamor out there? 'They take the clitoris?!'
>Yep..sounds like experimentation to me.
It could be? It is definately strange.
I do hear what you say, I suspect, and things are very confusing I'll admit. Then there seems to be the fact, in my opinion, that ET, they do lie to us. I believe that ET has lied to me. But I ask, why do they lie? What is it that everyone is hiding from us? The military, ET, the secret scientific ET groups....what? . . . I was taught by a Hybrid-Grey. I swear to God, JoKelly, I can see It now, off in a little dark area in the corner of my mind's eye. Its always there, just out of the corner. I don't dare to peer into Its eyes. I am not afraid, but I also know better. Back when I was a naive', "ET Phone Home" newbie, I invited Greys to teach me. The Hybrid-Grey appeared to me, at first like a grey spider, hanging from the ceiling in my dreams, no doubt, my inner being warning me, the only way it knew how, 'Run', its gonna wrap ya in silk like a burrito! But as I far as I could determine, it didn't't eat me. No, instead, over a series of dreams, It 'told' me, via the knowingness common in telepathy..via mind resonance, that the reason that they are Hybridized, is for the purpose of enabling them to operate separately from the collective of Greys which enables them to interact with Humans. Our consciousness is apparently unable to cope with the power of multiple Grey consciousness. I tend to believe this, as it seems that is what may have happened to my Mother in the mid-1960s. She flipped out, although she was a functional, trained Rosicrucian telepath, when the three Greys visited her, each night. There is no question about it, Mom, flipped out, so much so, that it required six months of chemicals and the repeated applications of electro-shock therapy, to switch off her alien contact psychosis. Thats a matter of public record should anyone care to check.
Derived from what I was 'informed', it seems that they are much more hive-mind oriented earlier in their development cycle than Humans are and because of this, they must 'tune-down' their complex psi-field interaction to interface with Humans. This action prevents us from being harmed when they interact with us. The question is why do they persist to interact with us, without making overt contact with us?
Sincerely,
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 13, 2012 15:43:09 GMT -6
this reminds me of the Trismigistus (sp?) machine. Originally made of copper wire and bits of things. Later it was discovered that merely a DRAWING of the "machine" worked. One put a picture in the "trap" and painted it or had intentional thought about changes and remote effects occurred. Hi Paulette,
Yes, I've heard of these type machines also. In fact I had an older friend back in the early 80s (before I was interested in ET subjects) who owned a couple. These 'intention' machines, were designed to be remote healing machines. His machines, (I forget the names? were in popular use around the turn of the century, often seen in doctor's offices and before the FDA cracked down on their construction and sales. They were considered to be 'quack-pot' machines by the medical authorities. Anyway, my friend, a retired Lockheed draftsman, asked me to help him repair his two machines.
They were beautifully constructed, with almost no metal parts used and there was no plastic parts of any kind. Both machines were dated 1885, but were apparently constructed by different people. Everything 'technical' was made of melanac (a common material used before the advent of plastics) and the electrical insulators were ceramic and phenolic. The machine had a very large panel, which was five feet wide by six feet high and was about one inch thick. It was very robust. Vertical 'panel' was mounted at the rear of a desk like a vanity mirror. Distributed around the surface area, 'face' of the thick, heavy black painted melanac panel were dozens of multi-position rotary switches, each position marked in beautifully scrolled letters either in white or on gold, either a number or an alphabetic letter(s). The variable one-turn 'tuning' knobs whose 360° position quadrants were also similarly marked with letters. Directly in the center, and at desktop level, were located 'sample' chambers. These were comprised of a semi-translucent material, shaped in the form of a 'box with a removable cover. They were also made of a pre-plastic era 'plastic' substitute, which was called, "gelatin". This yellowish translucent thin stiff material was commonly used to wrap articles such as shirts and used to bag children's toys retail stores in the late 1800s. It was organic but not petrochemical based as most plastics are today. This material so long ago forgotten by society, that there is not even reference to it in Wikipedia?? The 'read-out' device was a large format old style electric moving coil needle pointing meter (d'arsonoval movement) which pointed at '0' or NULL position when the machine's circuit was in 'balance'.
The principal idea of the machine's operation, --one would put an article of an ill person's property inside the 'sample' chamber or a drop of their blood, etc. The machine typically would indicate an unbalance condition. The machine's operator, using both a set of complicated knob turnings, switch position selecting procedures would find a position on all the knobs that caused the readout meter to point at 'NULL' indicating 'balance'. The operator then would read the switch position markings, knob position markings and then using those as the machine's 'readings' would look up the diagnosis from a chart of readings, which indexed into a table of illnesses. These type machines were also used by proponents of Edgar Cayce.
My friend who has since passed on, invited me to help him repair his machines. The schematics were one very large piece of paper, upon which was a huge circuit of wires going every which way, very complicated to follow, but in the final analysis, it was a simple loop of wire, feeding an amplifer driving the meter. The circuit was basically a tuned oscillator which was tuned by a coil that wrapped around the sample chamber. The 'amplifier' consisted of a single, four prong Edison Valve (old parlance for 'radio tube'). A couple of electrolytic capacitors had shorted which is quite common in old electronic gadgets. I replaced the caps and the machines both came alive. My friend was ecstatic, but frankly, I could see no logical reason why those machines could do anything of useful value. Probably, just another form of artificial psychic interface...a crutch for the operator to tune into themselves to wrought their majik. Know what I mean? Tea leaves, Tarot cards, Runes, yada yada... :)
Incidentally, according to Rosicrucian curriculum, Hermes Trismegistas, was the third incarnation of the Master YeHeShuVah, prior to His incarnation as Jesus Hasmone, the Christos.
Cheers,
plutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 13, 2012 11:32:08 GMT -6
Probably also why we've all ended up on these forums. Like attracts..etc. Also may be why our 'experiments' seem to work well..we have some common links among us. Well..maybe eventually we can do something constructive with it. :) No one get any hairy ideas of dialing ET >:( Hi JoKelly, I've posted this link before and I revisit the matter because, well its important to me for what happened and it is apro pro for the topic at hand. And using the gadget I made, it changed my life. Although I regret little about the experiences, I would not do so again. Its been ~15 years and I'm still smoke'n in a few places, as it seems not all the psi-fires are quite out. From the very beginning, the first time I set it-up running it on the roof of my home, things started happening. At first, just little but very odd things, like Morse Code beeping in a digital-volt-ohm-meter with no battery inside, or the modem tones emitting from anything with a speaker in it, whether plugged in or not? And there was the lab burnout, where all the hard-drives crashed, yet nothing else was affected (I had a 12 computer network strung about the lab, fortunately most everything was backed-up), and then, after getting everything back to running (what a nightmare), 1/2 of the lab was losing power, yet on the same circuit and same breaker, other powered instruments were running? It was like seeing magic at work. Current flowing in 1/2 of a length of wire? while in the other half of the same length no current flowing??, What kind of magic can do that? And my favorite, was all the Ground-Fault-Interrupters popping as I walked down hallways. And then, the really weird started, too numerous to enumerate. I was being 'followed around' by a pager number (this was before FartBuk and cell-phone proliferation) and the person who was being paged, I did NOT know and I did NOT know their phone-number, yet they were being paged with the phone-numbers of my clients (shades of Keel) office phone numbers, and as I went about my daily business calls. (I was writing business software in those days as a consultant). The 'paged' person became so angry, I was threatened with District Attorney action, "if I did not stop it!!" Talk about weird Indian-In-The-Machine? To this day, I have no idea how that happened? That one really creeped me out too. In other words, as I put more focus and effort into the experiment and my changing of the experimental modality, the high-strangeness changed commensurately. And even stranger, I was never able to acquire good quality data from the platform's data-logging strategies, and all of the high-strangeness had nothing to do with the platforms experiment modalities, yet seemed to be triggered by it somehow? and since I used no cameras, there are photos to present other than those few I imaged of the gadget itself. However, in time, I no longer needed the platform to 'contact' ET. My telepathy took over. It reminds me of being an Astrologer, initially, one requires an artificial interface to access the psychic realm, folks use all sorts of things for their 'interface' into Yetzirah. Some use tea-leaves, others use sand on a mirror (scrying), while some rely on Tarot cards and yet others use Astrology Horoscope 'charts', but in time, most will learn, that its simply a matter of turning in-ward, silencing the mind, so that one can hear that little inner voice or to see those little visions. We are the perfect interface, like our mouths, if we can just get our brains to shut-up. But back to the point, re; my experiments with dialing ET, it was a wild psi-ride and I'm not exactly certain what all happened?, but I can assure you, we are not alone, and that they are smart, and they know we are looking for them and what ever is happening, ET are not being entirely honest about things when they care to share info with us. They are the Tricksters. >>No one get any hairy ideas of dialing ET Here's how I dialed ET. In fact, I named the 'dialer' the ' ETp', (from 'ET the Movie'), which I shortened from: ' Extra Terrestrial phone' See my ETp contact experiment platform: www.setv.org/etp.html#ETP_Platform_Imagesplutronus
|
|
|
Post by plutronus on Aug 13, 2012 10:29:57 GMT -6
Yep *sigh* babies love me too. So that's another common bond and I cats hunt me out too..I am not partial to them (they just don't care that I'm not). Ok so we're a bunch of freaks ??? I agree too Plutronus that to be around another psychic field makes mine go bonkers...(translated..accents it significantly). I can always tell when I'm around another one, I tend to tingle and the hair stands up on the back of my neck. I think too that's why our little forum experiments work. You've given so much thought to all of this..and you have so much more connective awareness. I've always had 'strange' events in my life and the two 'alien' experiences but until recently I never even thought about connecting the dots or finding others with the same leanings. Because of my own happenings..I did come to the conclusion that I was attracting their interest like I do with animals and babies...and they are curious enough about it to experiment...to find why we're ' different'. Would you agree with that? Hi JoKelly,
Thanks.
<<< Because of my own happenings..I...come to the conclusion that I was attracting their interest...and they are curious enough about it to experiment.... Would you agree with that? >>>
What do you mean, 'experiment'...abductions?
plutronus
|
|